as a child welfare officer!!.would it not be more inkeeping for her to go out and look for the one she forgot to look after.
2007-10-24 00:37:18 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
She has lost the plot if this is true,How can she be serious when through her selfishness her daughter is missing.What next patron of children's charities.Do the McCanns think of anything else other than how they can con the public for sympathy
2007-10-24 04:22:39 · answer #1 · answered by mrs bean 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Child Welfare: Meaning "social concern for the well-being of children"
If the requirements for the job are leaving small children on their own for hours while she eats a meal and drinks wine then yes she certainly qualified to do the job! maybe over qualified!
2007-10-24 07:54:25 · answer #2 · answered by Hobbit 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
It was reported a few days ago I think but Kate McCann (or her freind/family) has denied it. So how true it is we do not know yet. I doubt if she will get anywhere with this new career change if there is any truth in it.
2007-10-24 07:45:37 · answer #3 · answered by Charley 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Your answer is in your question...it is reported.....that does not mean that it is factual...as you must know by now.
We do not know, and cannot even pretend to know what is going on inside any family who has suffered the loss of a child.
It is most likely a low news time, and the papers are trying to spin a new story off of this ongoing trauma.
Nothing about losing a child is a joke.....
Have a good day.
2007-10-24 07:44:38 · answer #4 · answered by Sue F 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Hmmm, actually it's Gerry McCann that is thinking of returning to work, and why not?! Kate has said she will not return until she know's what has happened to her daughter. As she is a GP I doubt that if and when she returns to work, it would be as a child welfare officer! Yes, the McCanns were guilty of leaving their kids alone but don't you think that they will never ever be able to forgive themselves and live with it for the rest of their lives? They are doing everything possible in their power to find their daughter, so perhaps you are being just a tad judgemental!
2007-10-24 07:46:56 · answer #5 · answered by Foxy Lady & Baby Oliver 24.10.09 5 · 0⤊ 6⤋
she would be better off cherishing the children she still has and using her time and energy to try to find her missing daughter
if she is serious about career change what is the hurry?
2007-10-24 07:43:34 · answer #6 · answered by Tequila.... 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
yes,i think she should be more concerned with the welfare of her own child,lets face it she is not exactly the poster girl for child welfare.
2007-10-24 07:47:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
It should be and you are right if it was my child I would still be out there searching.
2007-10-24 16:34:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
will her mind be on her job, because I know mine wouldn't be.
maybe they need the money
when would you say would be an appropriate time before going back to work, perhaps she realises her daughter is not coming back and needs to get life back to as near normal as possible.
2007-10-24 08:48:11 · answer #9 · answered by bluebellsx2 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
the only job she should be thinking of is the one she will have to do in prison
2007-10-24 08:14:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋