This is a funny question, but a good one because it makes one think. Katrina hit a crime ridden city, many of whom are dependent on our government for everything. And now the fires in California and as someone has pointed out, dead trees can't be removed because of the liberal tree huggers. Take into consideration that California is without a doubt one of the most liberal states that we have.
In both instances, these are noted areas that lack morals. Sadly, many innocent people suffer as well.
2007-10-24 00:33:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Sodom & Gomorrah theory, huh.. well I would hope not, but preventing forest fires for 50 years is not helping matters much.. Just building fuel for a disaster. Maybe they will learn better after this.. This is one of the Natural disasters that can be prevented to a degree.
2007-10-24 11:30:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Antiliber 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just another burn fueled by the number of trees that should have been cut down that weren't allowed to be by the tree hugger environmentalist.
To the dumb lib below.....the dead trees are not allowed to be cut down because of a beetle that lives in them. And the lib stupidity pole gets yet another notch carved in.
2007-10-24 07:01:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
David.....you are a tool!
If we throw liberal logs like David on the fire can it reach San Fransicko in time to cleanse the gene pool there?
2007-10-24 07:17:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Kalifornia is just a bad state, period. The land and the government.
2007-10-24 10:10:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Princess of the Realm 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Babe I guess your saying if we cut down all the trees there wouldn't be ant fires. Con logic what a laugh.
2007-10-24 07:08:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by David R 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
Ha ha ha ha lol any thing is possible
2007-10-24 07:14:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by debbri48 4
·
2⤊
0⤋