if people (say brennan from hawaii) are being eliminated for strength of schedule, why not eliminate people from teams who have losses. after all, if they were that good, they would be undefeated right?
2007-10-23 22:25:17 · 5 answers · asked by jaded 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Also if the team loses, it doesnt mean the player is bad, one man wont win the game its teamwork, but the person from hawaii may need to step it up more as the other players are doing better?
2007-10-23 23:35:45 · answer #1 · answered by M R Durf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
heisman is a joke anyway, the best player does not get it anyway its always who can sell their precious tickets in the big game, but sine all is losing this yr they may have no choice to give it to the best player, but if you notice they r juiceing up ryan from bc now, they talked about him before but now they r really talking about him since they r undefeated and i bet they will try to get one from ohio if they survive this next week, but well just have to wait and see what happens, hawaii will never get a chance bc of pollitics, its not fair but thats the way it is, plus really dont think i would want the heisman anyway cause they r all a joke in the nfl for the last 10 yrs, not one has proved they earned it
2007-10-24 06:49:37 · answer #2 · answered by PartyNaked® 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the Andre Woodsons and Tim Teblows can't controll what the deffense does. Andre Woodson threw for 432yards and 5 touchdowns in their loss to Florida.
2007-10-24 10:31:07 · answer #3 · answered by #1 Cats Fan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brennan throws way too many picks, besides whats up with that hair?
McFadden is the best player in NCAAF.
2007-10-24 09:28:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its all political...They should let coaches and maybe players across the country decide the Heisman, not biased sports writers...
2007-10-24 06:09:47 · answer #5 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋