LMAO @ the answers!
No one seems to have picked up on the contradictory messages in this sarcastic question.
Good question though.
2007-10-23 22:06:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by SR 2
·
6⤊
4⤋
Although the story of the missing girl is a sad one, but I couldn't help to laugh when I read your question.
You proved it once and for all: People either don't finish reading the questions or they read only what they want to read. And than they answer it (they think they do) AND post the answer.
2007-10-23 22:44:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Carpe Diem 3
·
5⤊
3⤋
Because the vacuous non-entities who go under the odious title of anti McCanns, i.e. the hate campaigners/Witch hunters lead a non-existent life, all they do is live in a pretend cyber world where they try to blag the respect they see decent members of society receive. One sad individual think it's acceptable to actually brag about spending the money the government gives him to feed his children (which, if he deserved respect, he'd do himself, or die trying) on drugs. As soon as they get the whiff of an honest person who will not resort to straying beyond the bounds of common decency they attack with vile scurrilous slurs and viciousness.
Do they believe people are as stupid as themselves and fail to be aware that if ANY of their concern were real then they would not be on here adding fuel to this outrageous hate campaign they would be volunteering to help the various children's charities crying out for help.
2007-10-23 22:13:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by ??? 3
·
3⤊
6⤋
haha i had to read that last sentence twice, and i thought everyone else did too..clearly not. Maybe Kate C is Kate McCann.
2007-10-23 22:25:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by YA RLY 4
·
6⤊
2⤋
I think the problem is their reaction struck so many people as really weird. If I had left my three kids alone, gone off boozing, and one of them had been snatched by a paedophile I would have hung my head in shame and not gone swanning off as some sort of international celebrity victim.
2007-10-23 22:09:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by john 4
·
3⤊
4⤋
Well said... i despair of these pathetic people. They go far beyond citing their opinions and just make spurious accusations on here. Its wrong and additionally, its against the guidelines.
I just wish that they would develop their small minds see the whole picture, not just the little section that they so want to believe in. For that matter... it makes me wonder about the type of people that they are when they want to only believe the worst in people every time. Horrible. Truly horrible.
And in response to Mimi - because we support the McCanns in their plight DOES NOT mean that we support parents who leave their children. But what i do find interesting is that is your reponse to this post - and which surely goes against the theory that the McCanns murdered their little girl? Get your argument straight before you make it.
2007-10-23 22:02:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kate C 2
·
3⤊
8⤋
I am amazed at how many people didn't underdstand that you were taking the pish.
2007-10-24 11:05:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Fiona R 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
Some people never cease to amaze me. lol
2007-10-24 00:58:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Radiator 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
WHAT! And let two totally Innocent doctors spend all that money on spin doctors for nothing
2007-10-23 22:01:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
3⤋
Oh no, we don't...wiseguy!
None of KNOW that the McCanns murdered & disposed of their baby...thats just cruel conjecture & speculation by the anti-McCanns who refuse to give it up...
2007-10-23 22:18:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Faith 6
·
2⤊
6⤋