2007-10-23 18:29:42 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no. how can you think so. think what happen to the great Britain. there is a possibility of china/India/Brazil will become super power in future
2007-10-23 18:35:06 · answer #1 · answered by vep 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No and we need to improve life such as better protection in employment since At-Will Employment contracts give too much power to business owners and wages are stagnant. Many owners hire managers that only care for profit and thus the American dream of good paying jobs has gone down the drain and most companies do not want their employees to retire and use intimidation and harassment tactics to get people to quit so they do not retire and politicians made it easier for corporations to do almost anything.
China will soon overtake the USA due to business people and ignoring this will not make it any better, Globalization which help many US companies to outsource many skilled jobs to foreign countries and salaries in the USA are stagnagt but economists find ways to obscure this otherwise many Americans would stop shopping at those companies sending jobs to other countries.
The Unions still are corrupt and are not trying hard enough to "clean House" and make it possible for the following website to exist http://www.unionfacts.com/
The Unions forgot why they were created which were/are legitimate but have become complacent and have not come up with viable strategies to battle people like Arnold Schwarznegger and Richard Riordan. Richard Riordan almost won against the Los Angeles MTA and is majority owner of Laidlaw and trying to win a contract to bus the students of the Los Angeles Unified School District. His daughter owns LA DOT and he is part owner of Transportation Concepts **** Riordan and daughter are ardent anti-union people and are determined to win and privatize many companies and low income people will be the losers.
Vote for those who are not bought by special interest groups.
2007-10-23 18:42:28 · answer #2 · answered by MIE 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. i think of one component that we are able to take a seat back guaranteed of at this element is that whoever receives elected would be a huge progression over Bush. not basically has Bush initiated undesirable coverage which favors the prosperous, yet has blocked the different coverage that favors the working classification. as quickly as a number of usa's affluence turns into obtainable to the folk who quite could desire to or choose for to spend it in the U.S. somewhat than make investments it foreign places or squirrel it away into their own inner maximum fortune, the monetary device will strengthen dramatically. in case you will see...while Bush quite DID seek for suggestion from the economists to return up with a "stimulus equipment", they directed funds quickly on the buyer. They themselves have envisioned that an insignificant $500 according to person in the palms of the clientele could "turn the monetary device around". The question then is, if it quite is such an obtrusive fact, why has trees coverage concentrated on tax breaks for the prosperous? the midsection classification is what drives our monetary device, not the folk hoarding gold bars.
2016-10-07 12:22:10 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a man do you know his name I'm not sure how to spell it its like Nostradamus or something but all of his predictions have came true about the twin towers and us bombing Iraq.. he books was on television and the world is supposed to end in the next 5 yrs many people may not believe this I'm not sure myself but this is the only guy in history who's predictions have came true (all of them have) but the world may end in the year 2000 scientist believe that the ice caps somewhere are going to destroy the world in 5 yrs.. Now that's a little weird... so USA might be the supreme power in the world if this doesn't happen they most likely will
2007-10-23 18:38:13 · answer #4 · answered by Jalena 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
We have been the supreme power in the world since about 1945. After all, we won the war and then rebuild both Europe and Asia, both nearly single-handedly.
It has only been since the 70s that Europe and Asia have become economic contenders. Nobody ever became military contenders.
2007-10-23 21:05:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I seriously question that the world would be better off without the Greeks under Alexander, the Romans under the Republic, or the English under the British Empire. The benefits of free trade and elimination of piracy and absolutism, have all been beneficial to the world and civilization.
It would be a sin for the US to abdicate such responsibility.
2007-10-23 18:44:11 · answer #6 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
And I used to think Rip Van Winkle was a
fictional character.We have the original guy here.Give us some dope on Dreamland.We are dying to know.Oh boy,the Sandman must have
sandbagged you real good.Sorry,no offence
intended.All in good humor.Once again my
apologies if I have offended,which certainly was not my intention.
2007-10-23 23:47:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We're probably the most powerful and internationally influential nation that ever existed (in a contemporaneous way - you obviously can't compare America's current influence to some nation's thousand-year-old historical influence), waddya want now?
2007-10-23 18:35:19 · answer #8 · answered by freedom first 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
We are the super power of the world. The economy of every country is dependant on ours. If our economy fell, the world would suffer along with us.
2007-10-23 18:36:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Whether one likes it or not, US of A is already the most powerful nation on earth.
2007-10-23 18:34:45 · answer #10 · answered by Alam99 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋