English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Even Bill Maher hates them:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=HFmqZVUG7Mw
I went to a memorial service in Manhattan on 9/11, and they were all over the damn place. The NYPD let them stand across the street and chant "9/11 was an inside job!"
So, would anyone here object to making it legal to beat them until red snotbubbles come out of their nose?

2007-10-23 17:50:26 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

I think they should all be sent to the FDNY an NYPD summer picnic. Any that make it out alive can do as they wish! Sorry tried to go to Iraq....it's an age thing...moron!

2007-10-23 17:58:03 · answer #1 · answered by Jay R 4 · 5 1

Jesus guy. Are you residing below a rock? needless to say the government became into in the back of 9/11. Who else became into it? Arabs who ought to extremely fly Cessnas? Who by no skill even flew the planes they supposedly hijacked and redirected without radar or any training? there's a reason the story makes 0 experience. the government would not care with regard to the 9/11 fact because of the fact they do no longer could. They administration the media and as long because of the fact the media by no skill mentions it, it won't exist for ninety% of the inhabitants. it relatively is a testomony to how stupid and brainwashed we are. i'm going to wager you do no longer even comprehend that a lot of those 'college shootings' are thoroughly staged. Dozens of them. just about each and one and all interior the previous 2 years. Yeah, welcome to fact.

2016-12-18 15:56:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

No, its called "Frredom Of Speech" and is guaranteed under the US Constitutio. Is not a crime to be a moron. Neither is to call Bush "Hitler" or call people that do not subscribe to the Democrat train of thought as "Neocons".

But if you feel like whacking a Liberal over the head with a baseball bat, go right ahead; just make sure you clean the fingerprints off the bat...

2007-10-23 18:23:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Wow, if self-righteous blowhard Bill Maher is against them, they must be wrong. While I don't support the people who interrupted his show, I think he (and you) needs to inform yourself a little on the subject beyond Popular Mechanics and the "debunking 9/11 myths" site. Are there many easily debunked theories about 9/11? Sure, and these sites do just as good a job shredding them as people within the "9/11 truth movement" who don't want the facts to be tarnished with stupid theories. It's the ones that are ignored, glossed over or flat out lied about that are problematic. One doesn't have to subscribe to any particular conspiracy theory to understand the simple truth - that the official story is a sham and that something is really fishy about the whole thing. Don't forget to beat up these "conspiracy kooks" as well.

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

2007-10-23 18:09:39 · answer #4 · answered by haywood jablome 4 · 0 4

The Constitution does not give you the right to harass people. They should not be allowed to protest or even be near a funeral. Its so pathetic to protest at a persons funeral or memorial service.

People like that were in my city holding signs that said "thank God for dead soilders" during a funeral. If i was a witness to them being shot i'd walk away and not say a word.

2007-10-23 18:02:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

I never thought I'd ever agree with Bill Maher on anything.

2007-10-23 20:55:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Nope, but a quick trip to the front lines of Anbar province should cure thier lunacy. Be surprised how fast the truth appears when forced to fight evil !

2007-10-23 17:59:27 · answer #7 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 3 1

beatdowns? No. That is a violation of a person's rights. But a swirlie or a wedgie would be fine.

2007-10-23 17:55:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

i heard that crap at ASU too. if only it could be legal but the first amendment protects them from judical reprimand. but not a shotgun

2007-10-23 18:17:44 · answer #9 · answered by avkedav 3 · 3 0

Yes, and also the "Liberal media" conspiracy theorists.

2007-10-23 18:19:16 · answer #10 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers