I will vote for the Republican ticket because anything else would be foolish and would invite danger to the USA!
Ron Paul is NOT I repeat NOT a Republican, he is and always will be a Libertarian. Pretending to be a Republican so they he may run a one of the two major party's tickets does not make it so.
I am hopeful that both Rudy and Mitt fade into the woodwork soon. Both are unacceptable conservatives.
The current Iraq strategy is to fight until we are able to successfully turn it over to the Iraqi Military and leave as soon as possible after that.
To simply say quit begs the question, where does that leave Iraq? Doomed to the terrorists, Iran or any other country wanting to take their land?
I am sick and tired of the BS about the USA not getting involved in other countries problems. Wouldn't that be nice...than why do we spend so much on relief for disasters, and humanitarian needs? Why do our celebrities go to other countries to care for their children, when we have sick and dying right here at home?
Because we are a nation who cares and it applies to the military support as well as the relief and humanitarian support as well.
I think it is very hypocritical for liberals to want it one way for social programs and another for the military.
2007-10-23 16:28:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
7⤋
Wow who would have thought some many good answers to the question. ONe thing is missing and that is anyone for a democrat, which leads me to think they rig their elections. Funny, the country is suppose to be divided 50-50, but on the net it's 90 conservative and not communist or socialist, makes me wonder. I have not had a chance to sit down and scope themall out, but I am proud that somany are on fire about this. We may be on the way to taking the country back.
2007-10-24 00:00:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by R J 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Dennis Kucinich, Ron Paul, Mike Gravel
2007-10-24 00:06:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by themicrowavemaster 2
·
4⤊
2⤋
Ron Paul
2007-10-24 00:07:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by vox_of_reason2 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
I would like to see a third party candidate run and win.
The Republicans have created a really horrific situation, going back it began when they went after Bill and Hillary Clinton during Bill's administration. They did everything in their power to get them. The only bad thing they could find was a BJ??? That is lame. They wasted millions of dollars, not to mention how much constructive time lost on this lame issue.
Oh and don't think I was a fan of the Clintons. I didn't vote for him either time and won't vote for Hillary. HOWEVER, the ridiculous behavior of the Republicans pushed me out of their party. They are simply mean spirited, hateful, controlling and war mongering. No thanks!
The Democrats? Please! They couldn't organize a successful PTA bake sale!
WE need a third party to bring us back together as a nation. We could have been united after 9-11, but Bush destroyed that unity.
2007-10-24 00:10:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by jersey girl in exile 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
Ron Paul the running repub.
2007-10-24 10:20:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jerry H 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Someone who can build up our economy. Put our national debt in a more workable amount. Strengthen our dollar.
So many promise things, but it seems there are people in charge that dosen't allow the President to actually do his job. The Federal Reserve should go back on the Gold Standard.
Does this mean Ron Paul?
2007-10-23 23:48:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by hjhaire 1
·
4⤊
3⤋
I'll vote for Ron Paul because he understands foreign issues, economy and the constitution. He is experience in the health care system as he is a doctor. He has a perfect voting record, never flip flopping, and the lobbyists know to walk right past his door. He cannot be bought. An added bonus, he would like us to be able to keep the money we earn instead of it going to the federal reserve, which by the way is not federal at all.(deceptive name though eh?) It is a private bank running our country into the ground.
Also, he wants to bring our men and women home, all of them. Can you imagine how strong our defense would be if they were all here on our soil? Perhaps taking care of things like illegal immigration?
I don't leave my kids at home unattended to protect them. Think about it. China doesn't spread its military all over the world for a reason, and because of that, NO ONE will try to attack China. We all know we need a strong defense, and our defense is everywhere else BUT here. Bring em home, the kids in this country need their parents.
2007-10-23 23:30:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by jessica m 3
·
6⤊
3⤋
Want? Ron Paul. Need? Ron Paul. Trust? Ron Paul. Accept? Mike Huckabee, but barely because of his pro-war stance, and soft illegal immigrant positions - that, and he doesn't have the record RP has.
2007-10-23 23:33:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by ThomasS 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Of course. Hillary Clinton.
As the wife of the 42nd President she occupied the White House for 8 years and is well versed with the role of the President.
In 2008 she would be there as the 44th President of USA.
2007-10-24 06:34:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by The Tribune 5
·
0⤊
4⤋