less talking...more bombing
2007-10-23 14:54:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
well hell yes, lets bomb everyone who disagrees with us. After all we are the great and mighty US, other countries should worship us. Maybe we can have another win-win like Iraq. That was so easy wasn't it, and Iraq didn't have a 1/10 for the capabilities Iran does.
2007-10-23 15:01:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by firewomen 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
actually Iraq was pretty easy, we destroyed their defenses and invaded the country, and over threw the government in about 3 weeks.
For our military wars are pretty easy....so long as we don't have to occupy, rebuild the place and create a whole new society,,,,that part is hard
2007-10-23 15:08:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I think if Gore was in charge we would have bombed iran a long time ago, to distract from the mess he was making at home. It worked for Clinton.
2007-10-23 14:57:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
I believe that we should leave other countries alone, we are NOT the world's police force.
2007-10-23 15:08:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by themicrowavemaster 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just let's bomb anyone for the sake of bombing. Bomb them there before they bomb us here. They have weapons of mass destruction. They hate freedom. Barf barf aarggh fart Fox news gooliegoolie
2007-10-23 14:56:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rikounet 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
IRAQ invasion by USA was sucessful because it has totally shatter IRAQ. And IRAQ can never make CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, NUCLEAR WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION.
Now it the turn for IRAN.
Neax ? INDIA if the deal is not throw.
Therefore POOR india is making deal with USA for peaceful use by POOR INDIAN.
Why?
It has no right other the first sole user of atom bomb ( USA used against JAPAN).
All can use it for PEACE (except propieter user- USA).
Like [POOR india is making deal with USA for peaceful use by POOR Indian.
Why?
INDIA GO NUCLEAR - Why, How, When What ?
TO MEET ENERGY NEED AFTER 60 YEARS India shall go nuclear and sign treaty like 123 / NPT.
Is nuclear deal of India with US is really worth? It worth down the line of 50 - 60 years.
[A}.-Why worth ?
1) Fossile fuel is limited in INDIA and world.,
2) Nuclear fuel is also limited in INDIA AS WELL AS in world but can give enrgy for some years.
[B]. - Con of Nuclear?
Cost of coal based power is Rs 1.50 / KWHcompared to Rs 3.00 /KWH for nuclear.
Like petroleum, Foreign currancy will goout for
1). TECHNOLOGY,
2). FUEL,
3). INSPECTION,
4). EQUIPMENT, ETC
5) dependent on other
6) Possible stopage of fuel on later date (like USA stopped for TARAPUR UNITS, canadian STOPPED FOR RAWTBHATA UNITS)
[C]. - Options for INDIA ?
OPTIONS with little or no foreign currancy OUTGO:
1) WIND mill with limitless energy
2) HYDRAL with limitless life span,
3) SOLAR with limitless life,
4) Municipal waste with limitless life,
5) Agriculture waste WITH LIMITLESS LIFE
6) COAL
7) GAS
OPTION WITH FOREIGN CURRANCY OUTGO:
1) NUCLEAR
2) PETROLEUM
[D] Why 50 - 60 years?
Now INDIA MAY SURVIVE with coal and gas, but after 60 years WIND, SOLAR, HYDRAL, WASTE cannot give sufficient energy for the INDUSTRY.
[E].- What is the option ?
INDIA SHALL USE NUCLEAR OPTION FOR ENERGY GENERATION
[F] What is about foreign currency, dependence?
1). SINCE 50 - 60 YEARS is long. INDIA SHALL EXPLORE IT'S 1800 KM by 2000 km land surface, 100 - 2000 km on sea bed to check if urenium can be extracted economically.
2) USA has formed NSG with 50 countries to deny access to nuclear fuel to countries like NDIA. World has 120 - 150 countries. INDIA can make an extensive search for URANIUM in the remaining POOR countries. It will help that POOR country for their economic unliftment and HELP india to gel fuel. But how does it stop the foreigncurrency outgo? Since these poor contries need is limited to " ROOTI-KAPDE-AUR-MOKAN", in which INDIA is strong enough; it can exchagne those goods with NUCLEAR FUEL ( if available). Since these poor countries does not have economical, technological capability, they will welcome help from INDIA.
[G]. Why this deal ?
If INDIA refused to this proposal, OPTION as in [F] above can not be materialised? Why? Since USA is WORLD DADA, it will influence other ( 125-50 = 75) countries not to allow INDIA for exercising OPTION [F]
[H].- Conclusion ?
INDIAN has no option but to sign the deal.
2007-10-26 19:14:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The answer is to elect "our-girl-hill". She can do anything!!!
Not.
The answer is to defend American citizens and American interests. If Iran controls the Middle Eastern oil supply we will have serious problems.
2007-10-23 14:56:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by GIVRO 3
·
1⤊
4⤋
sure, while were at it, lets see how fast we can make the price of oil rise and destroy our economy
2007-10-23 14:59:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by PD 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
well it would distract people from the quagmire
2007-10-23 14:56:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋