Even if they were going to make a nuke, they are 4-8 years away from it. And Cheney is getting the same phony intelligence that he got for the Iraq war and anyone with half a brain knows it.
So what's the big rush?
2007-10-23 14:24:27 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Its simple, they need a means to bring back the Draft so that more Americans will be able to achieve the glorious feat of dying for the good of the spectacular State. According to the Neo-Cons, men are basic evil and must be led in order to achieve greatness by a leader.
Neo-Cons get their political ideology from Machiavelli. They will use a Gulf of Tonkin incident as an excuse to attack Iran.
Of course, the left-liberal leaders also want such a war. The range of "acceptable" debate is whether we should invade Iran or whether we should already be there (the headline on Faux Noise this morning).
Unless we end up with Ron Paul as our next president, we are going to watch the draft return to provide the manpower to overthrow the democratically elected government of Iran for the greater glory of Israel.
2007-10-23 14:56:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Given the intelligence report stating 10 years to a nuke I dont see the big rush. Besides how many wars has Iran actually started in anyones recent memory?
More distractions from the falling dollar and inflation. People are catching on that inflation is happening. You here it now more than ever that food prices etc are all going up. Not long till we are forced to change the course. It wont be long until the dollar value is so low we cant buy raw materials for the war machine.
2007-10-23 14:33:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
We don't want another war, and according to intel the Iranians are 1 to 3 years away from getting a nuke. Of course we can always wait till one of their bombs explodes in an American City. Then we can listen to people like you blaming Bush cause he didn't do enough to stop it when we had the chance.
2007-10-23 14:40:32 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yea, nuclear weapons that could lead to another world war aren't a big deal at all. Who cares if the world is destroyed?And you're right, Ahmadinejad is a stand-up guy who's never told a lie. Also, you couldn't be more right about the fact that the thousands of security experts and military officials of the US and other countries dont have "half a brain" while you sitting in front of your computer know every detail about Iran's nuclear program.
Do you plan on joining the circus right away or do you want to finish pre-school first?
2007-10-23 14:34:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
So how do you know they are 4-8 years away? I don't want another war either but we need to be ready in the event something happens and if a Progressive Democrat (Hillary Clinton) gets in office we are all screwed anyway
2007-10-23 14:28:55 · answer #5 · answered by ja man 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If you are talking about iran, I think they may have nukes. It is possible russia sold them nukes and they are waiting for the right time to use them. just a thought.
2007-10-23 17:59:41 · answer #6 · answered by Timothy C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because "Neo-Cons" by your definition, do not exist, and you can attribute to them any qualities or goals you wish in the same way a cartoonist may have his characters get up from an anvil falling on their heads.
2007-10-23 14:31:26 · answer #7 · answered by You are all, weirdos. 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because they know that when election season rolls around they won't be able to fear monger as much
2007-10-24 05:48:47 · answer #8 · answered by Soul Man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IT'S A LOT CLOSER THAN YOU THINK TAKE YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOURASS
2007-10-23 14:34:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
haliburton is only up 19% then wanted 50% they pissed
2007-10-23 14:27:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋