there should be 5 paragraphs
1 thesis
2 reason (evidence)
3 " "
4 anticipated objection
5 conclusion
plss help me i cant understand this.
2007-10-23 14:16:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Homework Help
thesis is your arguement
then you have to support it with facts, in 2 paragraphs
state what the opposing side is arfueing over
state why they are wrong and you are right
2007-10-23 14:21:25 · answer #1 · answered by Mango Muncher 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I disagree with people who say that top schoolers are irresponsible while it is composed of open campus lunches. At our college, juniors and seniors have open campus lunch. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, the administration keeps the terrific suited to revoke a pupil's privilege if she or he chooses to abuse it. reasons? Going homestead for lunch is extra fee-effective. know that not all pupils will go homestead daily, yet that many will. Take most of the tension off of the lunch women. Our severe college has 900+ pupils, and a lunch room that holds approximately a hundred-one hundred fifty. attempting to head 500 people in the process the lunch line in a era is absurd. that's stable for us pupils to realize that we've a privilage that could desire to be taken away at any time. For sophomores that don't bypass sufficient instructions to be seen juniors -- no open campus. for college teenagers that consistently manifest overdue after leaving the construction - not extra open campus. for college teenagers that rush out of the automobile parking zone and get in an coincidence -- not extra open campus. interior of reach agencies get a strengthen from the highschoolers dropping funds there daily (although you may could desire to make certain between the saving funds arguement and the spending funds arguement..) desire this helps... Open campus is helpful, and that i'm sorry you do not have the excitement!
2016-12-15 07:45:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
all you need to do is write a paper that takes a position on the topic of off campus lunch. The thesis is your position in the argument, the reason is all of your evidence to back that position up. The anticipated objection is a problem with your argument that you recognize and then refute. The conclusion sums everything up and closes your paper.
2007-10-23 14:22:12 · answer #3 · answered by indie124 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe off-campus lunch should be banned altogether. For one thing, kids usually only go home to masturbate, smoke pot, take a dump or play xbox. What's more, it has never been fair to Freshman and Sophomores that they have to remain on-campus during lunch, and banning it for everyone would be the only way to keep it fair for one and all. Sure, everyone would probably complain, but then you must agree that the Grade Point Average of kids who leave campus for lunch is probably statistically lower that that of those who do not. In conclusion, it's obvious that the Powers-That-Be will never allow ALL grade levels to leave campus during lunch, so you could say that I'm just being realistic as well as pragmatic.
2007-10-23 14:32:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reason-the reasons off campus lunches are good for us are that not everyone enjoy on campus lunches. Some people are allergic to ingredients that the school mix in the food. Some time we need a brake to get away from the school for awhile and enjoy our lunches.
objection- not everyone could be agreeing with me, that is why on campus lunches could still be open so that people that like to enjoy a meal on campus can go to.
well i kinda started it so finish it
2007-10-23 14:24:46 · answer #5 · answered by smplytffny 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋