You misunderstand the use of the term "Federalist", and how it changed in the 1790s. But also, there is evidence Madison may have moved a bit in his positions under the influence of his good friend and fellow Virginian, Thomas Jefferson, AND in the political struggles that developed in the 1790s
To begin with -- in 1787 Madison supported the newly written Constitution (a document to which he contributed much --his own plans and compromises he helped broker). As a result, he worked hard to secure its passage. His efforts included assisting New Yorkers Alexander Hamilton and John Jay write a series of articles to explain it and "sell" it to the New York audience. Together these became known as the "Federalist Papers", because they argued in favor of the federal form of government represented by the Constitution.
At this point ALL who fought for ratification were called "Federalists". Opponents of ALL sorts were "Anti-Federalists" (a very diverse group, with different reasons for their opposition).
In one sense "Anti-federalists" died out once the Constitution had been ratified. But the former opponents went different directions. In any case, most accepted what majorities in their various states had decided on the matter.
But as the government actually took shape, the policy preferences led a significant group to oppose the policies of the Washington administration, and esp. of key leaders like Alexander Hamilton, who argued for a VERY strong central government. These folks began to work together and organize into "clubs" and into a separate party that usually called itself "Republican". (The local clubs had a variety of names, including "Democratic-Republican" club.) At the national level the most prominent leaders were Jefferson in the Washington cabinet and Madison in Congress. Note that this group was especially strong in the South, though there were also significant groups in Pennsylvania, and in New York (the latter led by the Livingstons, the Clintons and Aaron Burr).
As you noted, Madison and Jefferson were basically on the same page (often Madison acted as J's "lieutenant" in Congress)., including in the resolutions you mention. It is interesting, though, that if you look at what each contributed, Jefferson's actual view (on what ultimately became "nullification") was somewhat stronger than Madison's. This may reflect M's greater caution, or perhaps be one of those signs that he was a little closer to the OLD Federalists than Jefferson ever was.
2007-10-23 15:36:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by bruhaha 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i gotta supply it to my boy TJ, he change into an architect, author, diplomat, inventor, president and many more suitable issues i dont understand too a lot about James Madison yet Jefferson is my well-known president and seem in any respect his diverse fields of understanding by the way jefferson change into renowned for being terrible at public speaking, even as he examine his speach at inauguration in simple terms the first few rows ought to listen him because no microphones and he change right into a famously shy man or woman yet nevertheless my well-known haha
2016-10-22 22:03:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋