English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Because I am confused! You're all riled about about Government health care but
What happened to Terry Shivro and how you same people went on a witch hunt in favor of the Pro-life let The Federal Government get in the middle of State government and then congress exploited the family and the governor Jeb stuck foot in mouth?

Pro life = Health care for all!

So, whats the deal? Make the case…

This is a moral issue, so if you are pro-life thats fine, but how can one be so if health care is out of touch to obtain life?

You far extreme nuts have nothing else to do but slam people/children/disabled who want to live in a healthy world. But, in order to be healthy (like Terry Shivero) and have all those machines and people attending to her daily needs, you need health insurance… So are you PRO LIFE or ARE YOU NOT I just don't freaking get it

By the way I see you found someone your own size to pick on in the Wilekerson child

2007-10-23 13:27:54 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

And how can you people defend Limpbaugh making fun of Grame Fosters speech impediment that was caused in the accident, what kind of low life picks on a disabled 12 year old

2007-10-23 13:30:45 · update #1

I don't see the difference you claim Pro Life well the Wilkerson child wouldn't be alive without the Schip program you're all B$#^ing about and you sure didn't mind government involvement in the fiasco did you

2007-10-23 13:34:34 · update #2

I got something for you why did you want the feds involved in that healthcare issue but not Schip and I got sumpin you can suck on wannabe warrior

2007-10-23 13:36:06 · update #3

Ok if you're against the Government tell me why the run Medicare so well, offers seniors and the disabled choice has a low low overhead of just 1% and why didn't you stop the Medicare prescription drug bill which YOUR president lied about the cost of and is a far bigger cost than national healthcare will be

2007-10-23 13:43:12 · update #4

Hey Chuck kiss my A$$

2007-10-23 13:43:35 · update #5

RU you make some sense but I will take one small issue with you on 60K being livable, it really depends on where you live, now where I live you can live quite well on 60K (Indiana) but New York City with rents at $2000 or San Diego well I think we can argue that some families in these areas see 60K like some see 25K

2007-10-23 14:06:03 · update #6

Hey nimrod I'm a 48 year old Liberal who is self employed as a tradesman so much for YOUR stereotypes

2007-10-23 14:06:59 · update #7

By the way I didn't just join I've been suspended under my other handle by some Neocan buttwipe who couldn't take a dose of truth

2007-10-23 14:07:48 · update #8

I also see codamn is too big a wuss to take Email to be proven wrong what a little girl

2007-10-23 14:08:45 · update #9

My tax bill was $17,600 last year and your wussy codman

2007-10-23 14:09:20 · update #10

Here codman take a tour of my house bought and paid for with sweat blood and tears you idiot

http://estatesonthenet.com/ourhouse

2007-10-23 14:12:00 · update #11

By the way the woodwork is all my work jerk what is it you do number crunch at a desk, bet you can't do a real mans' labor like most conservatives you wear a tie and shined loafers which is what you probably are a loafer

2007-10-23 14:13:05 · update #12

RoadRunn you know jack Bro as stated above they run medicare just fine just underfunded, why should national be any different

2007-10-23 14:19:32 · update #13

Codloser I posted plenty you're still a littlle worthless pond scum who couldn't do a real man's labor like I said, loser I even showed you my house and told you my tax burden and what have you shown...............oh that;s right your backside

2007-10-23 14:20:57 · update #14

By the way cod you're so stupid you don't understand the name, how far in school did you go yourself, Neocon Killing 101 refers to a class or course in neocon killing you idiot

2007-10-23 14:25:40 · update #15

12 answers

they won't answer your question - ever.

cons think that by not answering tough questions that they will somehow go away.

yes, this is a moral issue...

2007-10-23 13:36:16 · answer #1 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 2 7

So, really, you don't want help; you just want to accuse people of being wrong since they disagree with you. I understand that; typical liberal.

Who says all conservatives agreed with what went on because with the Terry Schivo case? I didn't. I'm also pro-choice, not pro-life, though I am in favor of life. I don't know how "congress exploited the family" or how "governor Jeb stuck foot in mouth."

The SCHIP bill that was vetoed is pretty simple. 1) SCHIP is about children, not adults. 23 year olds are adults; they shouldn't be covered under SCHIP. 2) Parents making $80k a year should pay for their own children's health insurance. I shouldn't have to struggle to cover my family and then struggle to cover their family as well. 3) If it is true that the bill capped at $60K, those people still aren't poor. 4) It was a sneaky attempt by this congress to get national health care passed through the back door without debate. 5) The President has been telling this congress for months that he would not pass this bill as it stood, but he has been saying that he would be more than willing to compromise on an SCHIP bill. congress refused to do it. 6) If this bill was "the people's will," why couldn't congress override it?

As for that kid, I have no idea what you are talking about.

2007-10-23 13:51:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

Schaivo and socialized medicine are two different issues.

I have ALWAYS maintained that the government had no business getting in the middle of a family argument. As far as I'm concerned , the parents should have kept their noses out of husband and wife affairs. If Terri's family would have minded their own business, the case would have never went to court in the first place.

2007-10-23 13:44:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Killing 101
you are not a "neocon". You are a well bred socialist, and a young one at that. I can tell your a product of the socialized school system. The question you posed is of vintage Kerry and Viet nam. I see you just joined y/a, why? Do you have a job? Who pays your bills? How old will you be when you move from mommy's house? How much tax money have you earned, how much tax money have you paid?

I dont give e-mail out because of mo's like you. I posted a question, give me an answer. This is Y/A. Let every see your answer.

2007-10-23 14:03:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Pro life has nothing to do with a government health program. We can have health insurance without it being run by the government to royally mess up. When has the government ever run anything without cost overruns and waste? You are mixing apples and oranges and looking for a free handout, which national health coverage is not, by the way. Your taxes will rise by 20% and then you have the right to stand in line for a doctor appointment.

2007-10-23 14:16:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Your question backs up your first statement that you are confused. No conservative is "against health care," they are against having the government administer it. This SCHIP bill is not a moral issue, it's far left demagoguery. Conservatives support reform in the health care system, but that reform must leave the power with the people. Turning it over to the same people who run the DMV and the Department of Education is not the answer.

2007-10-23 13:39:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

The Terry Schivo case is a very poor example to your point. In that case Terry allegedly told her parents one thing and her estranged husband another.

2007-10-23 13:32:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

Terry Shiavo was not on welfare, she had paid for her health insurance. She must have realized that it was not the governments responsibility to provide her with health care, but her own. Maybe someday liberals will get on board and stop sucking the government teat.

2007-10-23 13:34:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

Cool your jets, my friend. Why call people far extreme nuts just because they don't happen to agree with you? I rather doubt any rational argument would change your mind, anyway.

2007-10-23 13:45:11 · answer #9 · answered by amazin'g 7 · 4 1

What the hell does Terry Shivo have to do with socialized medicine? You are the nut here.

2007-10-23 13:31:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8 3

Please take your medicine and go back into the trance like state the left keeps you in.

2007-10-23 13:39:24 · answer #11 · answered by The Voice of Reason 7 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers