She probably is. We just haven't heard about it yet. Wait till next year, i suspect that we all will hear a lot more about the Clinton machine and their fiscal status.
2007-10-23 13:19:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Clinton's marketing campaign--and all different campaigns--return contributions that violate federal regulations. there is no evidence that Senator Clinton's marketing campaign develop into conscious of any incorrect-doing. The Clinton marketing campaign--and all different campaigns--cooperate completely in any investigations. Hillary Clinton heavily isn't "arrested and located in reformatory for marketing campaign finance fraud", happy that might actually assist you out with this.
2016-10-04 11:11:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by persaud 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
with out the press the Dem's would loose most of their influence with those Americans who actually believe they report on stories as impartial observers (unfortunately there are quit a few) as it is now any one who would dare go against her would get shredded by the press. even when the truth does eventually get reported it will be as a quick by line with no retractions of false reports against Conservatives or apologies for their blatant disregard for the truth. and why should they care to even if or when they have to admit the truth the damage to the opposition is already done, as the afore mentioned Americans who actually believe in the press, will believe that there must have been some truth to the propaganda and smear campaign waged by the Dem's and the press or it would not have been reported.
I have run into this before with people who actually believe that the press is regulated or overseen by some agency that makes sure they only report the truth. sad very sad
2007-10-24 10:40:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by beanerjr 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just curious here...why would Pelosi actually be concerned about impartially doing her job?? It's all a power trip for her & nothing more. She's the epitome of a legislator who's been in office far too long & stayed there to further advance herself. With Hillary & Obama being the great hopes for the party, they could both probably commit high treason & nothing would be investigated on them.
2007-10-23 13:32:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by anna s 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
I think it is the Acting Attorney General who must appoint a special prosecutor, not Pelosi.
2007-10-23 13:57:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great Question! I have to go with C C and Disneylandfan!
Thanks for Raising this Issue! Hillary-Gate! When will we be FREE!
2007-10-23 17:21:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Because she is a Democrat, there must be a valid, just and well-intentioned reason for her committing fraud.
2007-10-23 13:15:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Yo it's Me 7
·
7⤊
0⤋
Because people who do things to get in her way end up dead. Vince Foster ring a bell?
2007-10-23 14:27:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by C C 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
Congress is more worried about Ellen's former dog.
2007-10-23 13:38:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
She should be! But, she's a Democrat and can do no wrong.
BTW, Pelosi is an @ss!
2007-10-23 17:13:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋