3 part question - Do you believe there should be a redistribution of wealth here in America?

Question

What does redistribution of wealth mean to you and how should this be done if you agree with it?

Which current presidential candidates support the redistribution of wealth?

Answer 1

It means you all have to move into Hillary`s Village where you will work and give her your earnings . She will then decide who should get the higher contribution from HillaryBank. The process is easy to follow ; you don`t have to work hard , you don`t have to have an education ; you can`t have things HillaryBank says` you don`t need ? HillaryBank will decide your solution`s in all of life's` problems for you . Want kids` ? They have to go to HillarySchool , where they are taught the dangers of a free thinking mind ! How harmful and unfair you will be if you think for yourself , doing things that HillaryBank doesn`t approve of ; getting a different education than HillarySchool , Inventing something beneficial to mankind that requires you to provide thousands of jobs` for people that are under HillaryQueen . Why you might even begin to want to do some things for yourself and your family without HillaryBank ? So where is this initiative for HillarySubjects to build a HillaryPlace to produce HillaryGoods ? HillaryVision will decide which HillarySubject will perform whatever assignment is dictated by HillaryVision. If your HillaryJob takes more skill and knowledge than other HillarySubjects , that will not matter as all HillarySubjects are valued the same unless a HillaryFriend is involved. HillaryFriend knows and understands that HillaryVisions`ends` justify the HillarySubjects means ! Now with a big HillarySmile , say I obey my HillaryQueen , I am an unworthy HillarySubject ; do with me what you will. I am nothing , I am nobody , I am dumb without without HillaryCare !!

Answer 2

1. No there should not be a redistribution of wealth in America, the economy would crash instantly and everyone would not have any money.

2. Redistribution of wealth doesn't even sound right. Why should people who make money, give their money to someone who chooses not to get a job. Personally I work hard for the money I get.

3. Hillary wants to take money from the people who make the most and give it to those who either don't have any or choose not to work. I am sure that Hillary wouldn't give any of her money to anyone.

Answer 3

This is one of those trick questions right.
the only way to really fairly redistribute the wealth is to have every person in the US send me 1 dollar.
We start this deal with me then you are next 300 million people.
No I didn't really think you guys would go for it.

Of course not that's freakin Communism and it wont fly here.

The re distributors are of course every Dem on the ticket with The Breck boy and The Hildebeast leading the pack.

Answer 4

I assume that the redistribution of wealth means you take away the wealth from the ones that earned it and give it to people that didn't earn it. If this is accurate - THAT SUCKS! People that earn something should keep it.

I'm sure Hillary agrees with that principle since she wants to raise taxes. The rest of the Democrats probably do to. (e.g., Edwards with his phony support of the poor as he gets $400 haircuts and screwed over people as a lawyer.)

Answer 5

1. No, because the economy would spiral downward, since there would be no incentive to get ahead. The desire to acquire wealth has the major side affect of producing capital and jobs (to be really rich, you need to own a really big company like Bill Gates).

2. It means government sponsored thievery.

3. Seems like Hillary, Edwards and B.O. are really in favor of it (although I bet Hillary and Edwards will find a way to protect their millions).

Answer 6

Rule #1.Distribution of wealth is a comparison of the wealth of various members or groups in a society, and is one aspect of the economy and social structure.

What it means to me:

It means to me, that I will work my *** off and you will distribute product of my labor between people who does not produce.


Rule#2."Typically, various racial and ethnic groups possess differing amounts of wealth, and the same is true when people are grouped by age or education. Different jobs bring in greatly different wages; the pay for some jobs is thousands of times greater than the pay for other jobs."

What it means for me:

You go to school, college (while accumulating thousands dollars of loans), or you working full-time and going to school taking evening classes and as a result somebody else who prefer drink beer on the front porch of the house, I helping to pay for (my taxes) , does nothing

Answer 7

http://www.filmsite.org/losth.html

Reminds me of the film Lost Horizon.
No. Because for centuries leaders have professed this
yet fall prey, as you said earlier, it's human nature.
It never works.

HRC and the most exaggerated example ever where the powers that be follow their own rules. It sure sounds good when they profess it... as if she will extend Capital Gains Taxes and reduce the benefits to the wealthy that paid for their library & numerous other ventures, beyond politics.

* Shar y! tagged me on my first submitt to this... communism & HRC go figure!

Answer 8

I'd have to say yes lucky sperm doesn't sound like equality to me.

10% of americans control 80% percent of the wealth wich makes them responsible for poverty crime degenerate types of porn don't make me give examples and a health care for profit system that ignores the poor or hard working americans down on there luck

I only believe in the redistrabution of wealth from companies that profit from necesities like walmart grocery stores energy gas health care and rental agencies

Answer 9

Why? Why should people work hard, make a good salary only to have it taken away by taxes?

Answer 10

1. ABSOLUTELY NOT.

2. It is taking money from hard working Americans and giving to people who refuse to work.

3. Hillary Clinton is the most active advocate at this time (cough **B!t@&**.... excuse me....).