Who is most responsible for the huge deficits seen under Bush?

Question

Bush or the Republican congress from 2000 to to 2006?

The president as the leader of the executive branch comes up with the budget request but it is congress who passes the actual budget (with input from the executive branch).

=====================

According to a Congressional Research Service study, the number of earmarks in spending, or appropriations, bills went from 4,126 in 1994 to 15,877 in 2005. The value of those earmarks doubled to $47.4 billion in the same period. Earmarked projects often include roads, bridges and economic development efforts.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2767546&page=3

Answer 1

Does it matter? In either case, it is the fault of whoever voted Republican. Let's not make the same mistake again.

Answer 2

Are you freaking kidding me!!! the position have you ever been the previous 8 yaers. First, 9/11 ought to have in no way befell if Bush ought to have got here again from his vacation and did some thing. He flat out admited on nationwide television to neglecting Huracine Catrina victims pointing out distant places change into more suitable significant. it really is not a conflict on terrorism or did you no longer get the memo that the iraq conflict has no longer some thing to do with 9/11. also, are u . s . a . isn't the great it has ever been are nationwide debt is larger than ever, and our econmy is horriable. human beings ar loosing jobs that pay $50,000 a year and dealing for minimum salary. over the past 8 years the wealthy have were given richer, the detrimental poorer, and we no longer have a center class. Our u . s . a . is not any longer the richest u . s . a . contained in the international China and Russia are way more suitable suitable off than we are. He shall we human beings deliver jobs distant places, and will advance pupil personal loan intrest cost to assist help a conflict that is going to be laughed at like vietnam, he is going to be considered as an fool like Nixon. Why do you imagine the yank human beings have democrats contained in the seneate now. they're giving him 3 months to exhibit his **** round in the previous they commence reducing him off. He also liffted the collge tution gaps, making it unafordable for persons to bypass to varsity. you would possibly want to be airborne dirt and mud detrimental or wealthy to bypass to varsity now. Get the info go searching you the yank all and distinctive isn't chuffed! he's a guffawing inventory, wait until eventually eventually they see each and every of the reruns of ways stupid he sounds even as he talks, then they'll ask your self how the hell he even were given elected!

Answer 3

George Bush.

His main mission along with Karl Rove's was to bury the Democrat Party for decades. Part of that strategy was to approve exhorbitant government spending in Congressional Districts that would benefit the Republican Party.

That was it. Look where the money was spent with an open mind. Now that the Democrats are in charge, Bush has all of a sudden become a fiscal conservative. Our President is a piece of trash.

Answer 4

Clinton
Could not resist.

EDIT:
It would be mostly President Bush's fault, Congress did everything he asked without question for those six years. All of the pork and earmarks were just a way to pay them back for bending over to the Executive's wishes.

Answer 5

Both and the democrats are pushing earmarks left and right as we speak- who is really innocent??? You know who is really to blame? The dummies who vote to send the SAME people back to Washington over and over again. 300 milllion people in this country, I am sure we can find the less than 550 people needed to replace those in office now.

Answer 6

Bush

Answer 7

Bush could have vetoed the idiotic spending bills, instead he signed into law every single bill the republican congress put on his desk

Answer 8

I agree they spent way to much, yet the dems ran on fiscal responsibility and just today The Senate voted 68-26 to kill the amendment offered by Senator Tom Coburn that would have redirected earmarks in the Labor/HHS/Education appropriation to funding health care for children instead.

What exactly does the pork in the Labor/HHS/Education bill do? It funds Charles Rangel's Monument to Me to the tune of $2 million, for one thing. That apparently has a higher priority in the Senate than health care for children. It also includes $500,000 for the National Council on La Raza from Tom Harkin (D-IA). Porkmaster Ted Stevens (R-AK) gets $34.5 million for an Alaska Native educational equity assistance program, one of the largest earmarks in the bill.

$400,000 for Figge Art Museum, Davenport, Iowa, for exhibits, education programs, and community outreach;
* $100,000 for a celebration around Lake Champlain in Vermont;
* $500,000 for field trips in the Chesapeake Bay;
* $500,000 for the “Virtual Herbarium” in New York;
* $50,000 for an ice center in Utah; and
* $130,000 for the National First Ladies’ Library Catalogue in Ohio

edit ok you want numbers:

In 1992, we spent 29.8% of tax receipts on national security. The Clinton administration—having listened to our complaints about government spending—felt our pain. With bipartisan support in Congress, national security spending dropped to 16.5% of tax receipts in 2000. Voila! Smaller government, just what we’d asked for! Surpluses galore! Yippee!

Had we kept national security spending at an even-keel 4½% GDP during the ‘90s instead of cutting it to 2.9% GDP, and had we spent it effectively to better handle asymmetric threats, guess what might not have happened in 2001? Hints: Our economy took a $1 trillion hit because of it; a war started because of it; we’re still running deep deficits because of it

Answer 9

God, I hate earmarks. If each of those had to pass individually they never would. PORK NEEDS TO GO!

Answer 10

The Republican Party is to blame.