Liberals, the violence in Iraq has been reported to have subsided 70% since June.?

Question

Do you find this to be good news? It certainly shows we're winning the war on terror and that the surge is working brilliantly. This also makes the Military and President Bush look rather good. How do you feel about this?

Answer 1

Source please. If true (and I have no reason to doubt the story, just the government and the media the provides us with the information), then it's about damn time, and I hope it continues. But the questions remain, what have we really accomplished and was it worth it?

Answer 2

A thirty percent improvement for a quarter year is a great improvement. Your other conclusions seem a to be either premature or foolish, but I don't expect logic from conservatives. But I'd feel good about reading that in the news (hadn't seen that article yet, I read the liberal paper on the way to work--I'll read the conservative one on the way home).

But come on: 'winning the war on terror'--I won't even touch that--the terrorists are still at large, plotting, scheming, and releasing fresh video; 'surge is working brilliantly'--it's only a surge if some of the boys come back, otherwise its just an escalation; 'Makes the military look good'--the military pretty much always looks good, and 'makes Bush look good', come on, you were already in love with him.

Please, prove that conservatives love idiots and will vote for the biggest most idiotic candidate that is put before him, as long as he can smile while he spits out the garbage he speaks. Vote Jojo or regerudd for best answer.

Answer 3

Liberals are not the only ones against this war.

Even if those statistics were not selective, we are NOT winning a DAMN thing. 70% less does not matter. Our troops are STILL dying needlessly, every day. This is NOT what I call progress. We're all of a sudden winning the war on terror? Certainly not. The war on terror is an impossible war to win because it's nothing but a damn SLOGAN. Progress is bringing our troops who have no business in that country HOME.

No, it does NOT make Bush look rather good. At all. It is definitely NOT brilliance. Are you effing kidding me???? You've got to be joking.

It's come to the point where either you support our TROOPS, or you support BUSH.

Answer 4

A thirty p.c. progression for 1 / 4 12 months is a huge progression. Your different conclusions look a to be the two untimely or silly, yet i don't assume good judgment from conservatives. yet i'd sense stable approximately examining that interior the information (hadn't seen that article yet, I examine the liberal paper on the thank you to artwork--i'm going to verify the conservative one on the way homestead). yet come on: 'triumphing the warfare on terror'--I won't even touch that--the terrorists are nonetheless at great, plotting, scheming, and liberating clean video; 'surge is working brilliantly'--that's merely a surge if many of the lads come back, in any different case its merely an escalation; 'Makes the militia look stable'--the militia rather plenty continually seems stable, and 'makes Bush look stable', come on, you have been already in love with him. Please, practice that conservatives love idiots and could vote for the main important maximum idiotic candidate that's positioned previously him, as long as he can smile whilst he spits out the garbage he speaks. Vote Jojo or regerudd for superb answer.

Answer 5

I think it is very good news. Winning the war on terror? hmmm I don't find it to be as relative as you do. So tell me, when can our troops leave Iraq? Do you conservatives have a plan? Thought not. And for all of you Rush Cult members that keep repeating his BS that Democrats want to lose the war on terror, I have a clue for you. You and your God Rush are all full of $hit. However, just keep preaching his hate messages. It just shows your intolerance toward the majority of your fellow Americans.

Answer 6

Iraq isn't in a bubble. Al-Qeada just claimed the bombing in Pakistan killing over 100. Is this just more whack-a-mole ?
Last year's low was 31 troop deaths, this year's it's 28.
Better but still not good enough.

Answer 7

Those are the numbers put out by the Bush administration. In the immortal words of Marvin Gaye "Believe half of what you see, and none of what you hear."

Answer 8

There was no terror before the USA went into Iraq!

Answer 9

That bornagaindiot in the White House is LYING TO YOU AGAIN... the figures are SELECTIVE... the violence has gone down in Baghada but it has gone UP in the rest of the country.

Born agains are really good at picking their 'facts'... because this administration tailors the 'news' to fit the 'facts' that it wants you to know about.

I have been tracking the number of DEATHS and it hasn't changed in months... it's still about 1 1/2 deaths PER DAY.

Only a total FOOL would believe ANYTHING that lying Bush would tell them... it's hard to imagine anyone is that stupid... but... they are republicans and born agains... so that says it all.

Answer 10

I think its super all of Bush's buddies are getting richer and richer, and at the expense of the American taxpayer no less

Bush has looted the federal reserve

cons seem to be totally oblivious as to what the war is about ... and why it continues

not to mention feuding factions are no closer to reconciling their differences ... we hear what they want us to hear, I put more credence in what former commander Sanchez had to say, he doesn't have to answer to Washington anymore

Answer 11

I think the administration is re-arranging the deck chairs beautifully!