Castro need to be put in a rest home. His thunder disappeared when Russia fell.
2007-10-23 09:28:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by rance42 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Erm I think thats meant to be small fish in a big pond otherwise you are paying him a big complement.
Castro himself is likely dead , these essays are probably being produced by a government news agency in Cuba.
The comments that he doesnt know whats going on in his small country without newspapers is laughable comming from the least aware country on earth (way to produce brainiac beauty pagent bimbos! - Iraq - isnt that in the US?)
And given enough time the half wit could probably have sparked off WW3 but fortunately his power has been reigned in and the Democrats will soon be back in office doing what they do best. Repairing the damage done by the previous Republican Idiots and putting the economy back together for the benefit of the Country , not there buddys.
"No. It's the terror nations led by evil dictators that refuse to lay down their nukes, violate resolutions that will spark WW-III."
yes thats what Castro said - The US led by Bush
2007-10-23 09:21:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
An attack against Iran could very well trigger World War 3. China and Russia are backing them, and both countries are pretty pissed at us.
As far as it just being Bush? No. "Top Candidates" from both parties have all invested interest in attacking Iran.
If anything in current events sparks World War 3, it would be an attack against Iran. Which looks like it could happen soon.
2007-10-23 09:13:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Hellion 3
·
7⤊
0⤋
Bush claimed he could spark WW3, too, because of Iran...
Bush and CAstro seem to be In Sync, on this one (or are they more like the Backstreet Boys?)
____________________________________________
Not a Lie Penelope - Bush was the first person I know that stated that the Iranian desires for a nuclear weapon would start WW3... Now, why is Bush the first to make this THREAT? No one else made this knee-jerk reaction except our knee-JERK in Chief.
2007-10-23 09:11:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by outcrop 5
·
9⤊
2⤋
Penelope Pitstop, listen for a minute to your own rhetoric, it does not make sense.
I know you love the Neocons, but at least use common sense when spewing your rhetoric.
If Bush attacks Iran, he will start WWIII.
2007-10-23 09:50:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
i would not consider castro after all. if he instructed me the solar got here up interior the East i'd look and verify. Oh and that i want to advise which you examine the bible regarding the "antichrist". Bush isn't it, not even close. Iran's President suits the bill plenty greater useful.
2016-11-09 07:32:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by piano 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well considering that every country in the world worth worrying about has just engaged in another Arm's Race, I can't completely disagree. Sure appears that Bush sparked that!
Russia, China, USA, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Israel, all developing new weapons.
2007-10-23 09:18:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Boss H 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
How odd? Bush says it is Iran that could spark WWIII.
2007-10-23 09:20:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Michael M 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
For goodness sakes, wake up and see that we had no reason to enter Iraq, and that Bush and company have no credibility at home and around the world. LOTS of people could say Bush could start WWIII because of his FAILED RECORD.
2007-10-23 09:19:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by alphabetsoup2 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
Can't say that I ever have agreed with him.
It's not like he's the first person to have enough of an overactive imagination to put "Bush" and "WWIII" together in a sentence.
2007-10-23 09:17:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Emma 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Castro thinks Bush might start WWIII, I don't think if it happenned it would be all his fault, bu its not a lie to say that, its just an opinion.
2007-10-23 09:16:14
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋