I'd go with Moore, Pilger seems quite boring in comparison.
2007-10-23 08:35:30 · 7 answers · asked by Darrell 4 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
i agree
2007-10-23 08:50:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Michael Moore.
2007-10-23 23:16:51 · answer #2 · answered by trancebabe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Moore is more entertaining and is a witty polemicist, but Pilger is more rigorous in his journalism and sources. They each have their good points but Pilger is the more precise of the two.
2007-10-25 05:20:44 · answer #3 · answered by Huh? 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
you`ll get all the truth from John Pilger !
(please dont think hes boring in comparison!)
michael moore although entertainingly put, cannot give you ALL he has to say..he is bound by a media that wont let him say evrything he wants to say...Anything with John PIlger`s name on it YOU SHOULD READ/see people !
2007-10-24 00:33:53 · answer #4 · answered by openyoureyespeople! 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Michael More is more entertaining and more frequently accurate whilst John Pilger has a reputation of "faking" his stories. He has been caught out faking material on "Cambodia, Year Zero" and the story on "Child Trafficking in Thailand".
2007-10-23 17:57:20 · answer #5 · answered by Walter B 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Neither can give an unbalanced view, Pilger spews out his anti Americanism drivel in that monotonous tone of his while Moore has been proved wrong on many occasions
2007-10-23 08:55:19 · answer #6 · answered by RAH RAH 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Moore is very entertaining, with some good suggestions.
2007-10-23 08:50:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋