They obviously know more than the public, and we're all just idiots who will elect the person they choose anyway.
2007-10-23 07:58:26 · 9 answers · asked by sagacity incarnate 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I'm not an idiot: I meant everybody else.
2007-10-23 08:11:36 · update #1
The media pretty much did appoint the current guy, and that doesn't seem to be working real well. Maybe the next time, we should try having the media just describe the candidates and issues honestly and letting the voters choose. Unfortunately, that would require a more honest media than we have.
2007-10-23 09:05:18 · answer #1 · answered by A M Frantz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
thats why the democrats want to assure you that the troops will be home by 2013. for example Hillary want to raise taxes to send people out to war and doesn't assume the troops will come home by 2013. Barack Obama saids if musharaff"our ally to the USA" doesn't act if Osama Bin Laden is there we will. He doesn't have much information which does concern a lot of people. Rudy Guiliani wants to bomb Iran without comfortation and wants to raise taxes for the war. A lot of CFR members want to do the same exact thing. We are already more scared then a child who is afraid of the dark. I mean why do we have to put up lies when taxes are going higher and economy is sliping into debt. A lot of people are in poverty, and the people can't take it anymore. It already come to the point that people have to decide what is best and how do we fix bush's mistake. the Military, The taxpayers, Britain, and the people who think is best to march with the constitution voted Ron Paul. As a lot of people said freedom is popular.If i must warn you look at your candidate first before voting for them. Wikipedia is not a very good information some are false while some articles are true.(just to warn alot of people). I used to be a Barack Obama supporter, but he shot me own with change thats worries me. the other one is how he said if one of our allies does not act on it that he will. Look at the acts are replace today and who is against it. There are some law acts that is pointless and takes alot of people freedom away rather giving freedom. the media doesn't understand the basic concepts between the CFR goals(Communism of Free Raid oops i'm sorry i mean Council of Foreign Relations). Council of foreign relations have been the presidents for 57 years.
2007-10-23 15:51:52 · answer #2 · answered by warlord m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it would be except the media wouldnt get all that money they raise through advertising during the elections, they would all go bankrupt, and there would no longer be any media. then what? or worse- all the stations who pay taxes would go bankrupt, while all the privately funded liberal stations would continue to inexplicably receive money under the table, and another conservative would never win an election ever again!! at that point you might as well move to china or russia- im sure you would be better off there, especially if you're not already on welfare or if you are actually paying SS
2007-10-23 15:10:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. I am for their reporting the votes by precinct during the election though. And I also believe in a secret vote for the House and the U S Senate.
2007-10-23 15:13:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The public doesn't elect the president anyway, so what's the difference?
2007-10-23 15:37:16 · answer #5 · answered by jacquie 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
we should put the two tribes Repubs and Democrats on an island and let them see who the Survivor is!!
add Condi in her underwear to the Repubs to help the ratings
which Repub guy will end up being the "naked guy" ??
eeewwww!
2007-10-23 15:07:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Believe it or not, the media DOES basically appoint our leaders. If the candidate is savvy enough to play the media properly, they do his campaigning for him...
2007-10-23 15:04:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
THEY already have MRS HILLARY CLINTON -the media darling
2007-10-23 15:11:18 · answer #8 · answered by seawolf 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
that's whats happening now you idiot...every single media outlet is left wing...except for fox...
2007-10-23 15:04:24 · answer #9 · answered by danno 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋