If Bush cannot handle Iraq, what makes him think he can handle Iran?

Question

And their allies? Will he bring Rumsfeld back to disband their army as well?

Answer 1

Bush has already handled Iraq. Their army is now our ally or haven't you been paying attention. Remember the Iraqi Army that we destroyed in 4 days of ground fighting in 1990, well they destroyed the Iranians previous to that. I have no doubt, that we can destroy their Army is less than 3 days, but the official estimate will be a week.

Answer 2

Any Incursion or military effort against Iran has to be an International initiative.

We absolutely should not go into Iran with out the full and equal support of our allies and the U.N. as a whole. that is, every nation of the U.N. contributes soldiers and supplies in equal measure, Countries will ineffective militaries can handle logistics and supply.

By no means should we shoulder the burden of 3 ground campaigns. Some of these other countries that are getting some of the benefits from our efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan should be made to put up or shut up in Iran. Nor should we encourage Arab nations to view the U.S. as specifically hostile to Arab nations.

In fact, we should pussyfoot around until we get some apologies for lack of support in Iraq and Afghanistan, and some recognition from those other countries that they need us.

Answer 3

Odd how there's this mentality that the President is single-handedly running the war. He gets the really big stuff, but most of the rest is delegated to various military personnel. If the military were allowed to do its job without fear of political repercussions over minuscule details (or, in Jack Murtha's case, outright mendacity), we could handle Iran if necessary and Iraq would be over a lot more quickly.

Answer 4

Bush obviously doesn't have a long timetable to work with but I don't think he cares much about the implications of attacking Iran. Did Kennedy, who was supposedly very liberal, care about invading south Vietnam, resulting in millions of deaths?

If Iran was attacked, the Iranians--those content and upset with their country's officials--would certainly unite and fight against foreign occupation. The only result would be heavy bombing and casualties initiated by the US, which would end up in basically genocide. The consequences of a war with a Iran are very dismal, but Bush and his bullying and righteous stance don't convey much hesitance.

Answer 5

I personally think that Iran is no different than Iraq when it comes to invading the country. But the timing would prove to be much more dangerous to the whole world to the point that is hard to comprehend by the average mind.

Answer 6

The Patriots are winning in Iraq in contrast to your desires and Iran is more divided that the gulf between you and me which is vast. Banks are Leaving Iran and the regime is rotten, I am sure you feel the regime here is rotten but you can't achieve a victory in YOUR house or senate. so what makes you an expert on what Bush can do, you got Iraq wrong.

Answer 7

let us blame someone else about the worlds troubles,heck,,,bush is an easy target,got to be his fault,cannot be the lack of morality that the world sees us diving into...do some research and quit watching news shows and making rash decisions from what you hear.Iraq and Iran are the problem now ,but China is the sleeping tiger,and in about 2 to 3 years,say goodbye to the freedom you are used to and thank a democrat.

Answer 8

Bush is an oil greedy war monger and Rumsfeld....he was a piss poor excuse for a secretary of defense. Its because of crooked politicians like them that this great country of ours is in the shape it's in

Answer 9

He can't handle finding the men's room by himself.......Dick Cheyney will tell him some fool thing that the Iranian president stuck his tongue out a Barbara and Georgie will get all pouty and whiney, and Uncle Dick will tell him, 'see, I told you you should have went in there' and encourage him to forge ahead with no plans, no manpower and a definite lack of brains....I think they'll call it the Surge Part Deux...

Answer 10

He is arrogant and as a friend of mine says, it shows how a little education can be dangerous.

Cheney is dangerous. He's evil too. He's a fear monger.

We cannot afford to stay in Iraq and nor can we afford to go to war with Iran. It doesn't make sense anyway. It is not making us better off. Bush and Cheney are big time deceivers. If they aren't lying to us then they are lying to themselves.