No, he has not pushed the world to the brink. Islam has done that. Did you convert yet? If not, they want you dead.
2007-10-26 20:07:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I guess you see by some of the answers here that they will follow Bush to WW3. Right or wrong.
My question to Neo-cons is who is more of a threat. The ones who threaten war or the ones who actually starts it ?
Being so quick to say yes to war also means you must be as quick to join or have your kids join. No one is standing on line to register for this war so what makes the rest of America believe neo-cons (far-righters) will sign up for WW3 ?
2007-10-23 08:05:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by cjgt2 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Although I agree that W is quite incompetent, it is a very questionable and debatable proposition to suggest he has "pushed the world on the brink of WWIII." I suspect that neo-cons will cheer him on just fine, because none of them will believe that your statement is true. Hell, I hate the guy, and I don't believe it. In a year and a half he'll be a black spot on our history and we'll move on. So yes. They will cheer him on. Why wouldn't they?
2007-10-23 07:07:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mr. Taco 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Russia is keeping South Ossetia, and Georgia develop into the 1st one to attack, Georgia is enjoying the harmless sport like they did no longer do something. Throwing interior the He mentioned She mentioned ingredient isnt helping the two. the ingredient is, the two between the aspects are idiots who do no longer understand sh*t, and that's in all probability unlikely to boost into WWIII, experience Georgia isn't area of the UN yet, of NATO or what ever, in the event that they have been, and Russia attacked them, we would be in WWIII suitable now, in all probability... All i understand is the tip is close to...
2016-10-04 10:42:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
But of course, and I believe that he, himself, believes himself to be the return of Christ, to come down in a flame of glory in the middle east and fight the fight until the end. His fan base of neo-cons will be cheering him onwards into battle, using our children as cannon fodder, with theirown safely esconsed in ivory towers somewhere.
He struts around claiming how Christian he is, but if he would even open his Bible instead of using it as a prop, he might realize that he resembles the Anti-christ more than the second coming of Christ. After all, even Satan uses scripture for his own benefit.
2007-10-23 07:21:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by momatad 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yep, and in addition, the spineless Demozombie coalition will not inspire enough thought to enable people to vote for them. It takes two to dance, even while the ceiling caves in.
2007-10-23 07:31:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure, and so will the Democrats. Bush couldn't have gone to war without his illiberal friends in the Democrat party and he couldn't have continued it without them either. Not to mention it was the Democrats that tried to condemn Turkey which made the situation a lot worse for the United States.
2007-10-23 07:08:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by qwert 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
Isn't this the height of stupidity?
Muslim extremists are busy burning the world to the ground, and the only thing that liberals can do in response is blame Republicans for defending us.
Isn't this a clear sign that liberals can never be trusted with national security? When will they take the safety of our nation seriously?
2007-10-23 07:07:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
That is exactly what liberals were saying in the 80's during the Regan administration and the cold war, and look at the results, the USSR crumbles and communism is on the run, and the Berlin Wall came down, and federal income revenue sets an all time high.
You liberals would rather ignore terrorism untill you are beheaded.
2007-10-23 07:06:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Curtis 6
·
3⤊
4⤋
Your finger's pointed the wrong way again Chi. And as a result, yes, I do support the president's efforts to address the domestic and global threat of Islamic terrorism. It's about time someone did.
2007-10-23 07:12:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by The emperor has no clothes 7
·
2⤊
3⤋