2007-10-23 05:29:43 · 8 answers · asked by S 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Too many policies specify black ink, but I prefer dark blue ink so that the original can be detected versus a copy.
2007-10-23 05:55:17 · answer #1 · answered by knoodelhed 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can use either color but many lawyers like to use blue ink because it helps to readily identify an original document. Many notaries prefer stamps that emboss the documents for the same reason....
2007-10-23 09:20:04 · answer #2 · answered by lillllbit 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The law firm I work for perfers me to use a blue ink on anything I sign, this way you know the original from copies. You are allowed to use blue or black though.
2007-10-23 05:35:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I used to use BLUE ink, to be able to recognize the original from the copies... But both are accepted.
2007-10-23 05:41:07 · answer #4 · answered by Motitad 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i don't be attentive to which you "would desire to" use black ink yet maximum criminal documents require it. you're continually secure using black ink by way of fact it would not fade like different colours and it shows greater for sure on copies. It additionally seems greater professional.
2016-11-09 07:11:19 · answer #5 · answered by ritzer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blue is preferred, as it easily lets you know which document is an original and which is a copy.
2007-10-24 07:03:08 · answer #6 · answered by Jolly Gardener 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
blue is preferred to easily see the differences between a copy and an original... both are acceptable.
2007-10-23 05:36:27 · answer #7 · answered by Jeanette 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Black is better. It copies well and looks more professional.
2007-10-23 05:32:41 · answer #8 · answered by sensible_man 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋