How many children have to die from lack of health care before President Bush is happy?

Question

Johnny Smith

Answer 1

That's tough to answer. Perhaps if I knew how many have died from lack of health care so far I could give a good answer.....

Have you a link to show how many children have died from a lack of health care?..........

Answer 2

this is in all probability the main logical ingredient Bush has finished in years. This software might value billions, and can positioned the government on top of problems with too many human beings's lives. Socialized drugs is the worst ingredient which could take place to guy or woman's healthcare. i comprehend it sounds unfeeling, yet a minimum of Bush had the middle to do it. The Senate merely authorized yet another $a hundred and fifty billion for the conflict via a ninety two-3 vote because of the fact too many human beings are nervous of finding undesirable and not helping the troops. Politicians might desire to start doing the right ingredient, no longer what seems good interior the paper.

Answer 3

I have never seen a hospital neglect a child any kind of care. I have seen, however, neglectful parents not give their child medical care.

And how many kids do you know that actually have died. Because according to Hillary and liberals, it is a huge epidemic that needs to be taken care of. So how many kids do you see dying or dead in a hospital from lack of being taken care of and not from a already terminal, incurable, illness? I am pretty sure if a whole bunch of children were dead from lack of hospitals, a slew of angry parents would be coming out of the woodwork complaining about lack and neglect of health care and not a slew of desperate politicians on the left.

Answer 4

Stupid question.
Thanks for proving me wrong, I thought there was no such thing.

1. No children are dying for lack of health care. Hospitals do not turn anyone away because of lack of insurance. If you weren't just a parrot for the moveon.org Liberals, you might know it.

2. Did you read the SCHIP bill? I bet you didn't... because then you'd know that it has nothing to do with poor children's healthcare. It has to do with giving illegal immigrants free healthcare... they're still trying to force-feed us this amnesty crap and you're enabling them by blindly spouting their rhetoric. Good job!

Answer 5

I doubt that Bush is happy that children die in the US, when they would live in other countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_infant_mortality_rate The infant mortality rate in the US is higher than that of most other western European countries, in fact it is higher than that of Cuba. So while I would not be able to name a child who has died due to US health care policy, there will be many who would ahve lived in the UK for example (which is where I live).

As for cost of health care, the cost of health care in the US is higher than that of most other countries. In the UK, not only do we have a lower infant mortality rate, we have a higher life expectancy and out health care costs less. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care#Economics

Remember, in the UK, and other western European countries, you can still choose to pay for private medicine. Having 'socialised' health care costs us less, gives the population a better service and still gives us freedom, if we want to pay more, to have additional health care.

Answer 6

How many children have to die due to lack of health care before their MOTHERS sign them up for programs like the SCHIP. A large portion of the qualified children have not been registered for these programs.....you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.

I second Brian - link to the number of dead kids would be helpful.

Answer 7

I don't know but I am glad the Socialized system failed or I would have had to drop my insurance for a low quality Government substitute.

Also the Liberals in the House knew they didn't have the votes to over ride the veto and the President would have signed the bill if they didn't make the max 85,000 income a year that all houses in the USA would have been forced onto this plan, thus communizing medical in this country.

So your bastard children would get better health care than I would receive after working hard my entire life.

Your failed life choices are not my fin. burden to bare.

Thanks I feel much better after destroying your question.

Answer 8

I refer to my question prior, I have no interest in why there was a veto, I have no interest in grandstanding children before the cameras in Washington. I do have a genuine concern for children who need care...in this country...right now. Both parties talk about it and become too busy slamming each other over the issue...meanwhile nothing happens for those in need.

Answer 9

Only the poor and middle class ones. Imagine what would happen to Tiny Time today if Bob Cratchett didn't get help from reformed Mr. Scrooge. Scrooged started out as a conservative and had a dream that scared the crap out of him. He saw reality and turned progressive. As a result Tim Cratchett got health care he badly needed. Dickens' "A Christmas Carol" is a very appropriate story today. Scrooge the stereotypical con. and then reforms to be progressive. Our Scrooge nation is soon to have the dream and we will see more help for Tim Cratchett and we will see many more reforms agreed to by Scrooge and other reform minded people.

Answer 10

Is it hateful to not recognize that breast cancer victims are far more likely to die in England and Canada than in America?