2007-10-23 04:20:48 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You asked this yesterday> And you still haven't picked me as the best answer. LOL
2007-10-23 06:06:30 · answer #1 · answered by Jared G 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would Veto programs that take away our free will. We should all be giving generously to the poor but not by the way of welfare, where the government decides how, why and how much of our money is spent.
He would Veto anything that makes morality a law.
He would support anything that would allow us the freedom to choose to serve God and He would support and Bless any of our leaders who seeked God's will before making any decisions.
A community of believers who follow God will be blessed. Doing the "right thing" because the powers that be say you have to is not what God asked us to do. We are to love the Lord our God above all else and love our neighbor as ourselves. Give Ceasar what is due Ceasar but give God what is due God.
2007-10-23 14:18:51 · answer #2 · answered by barksabit 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Talk about a loaded question!
First, he would preach education (teach them to fish so that they may eat a life time, not just give them a fish (a social program like welfare and universal health)).
He would praise greatly the working poor ( ABC New's 20/20 shows they donate more percentage wise than any other group) for their open hearts, open wallets.
He would be greatly saddened by the bickering democrats and republicans who point fingers at one another (the tax collector and the pharasee -- both being the pharasee and believing themselves to be the tax collector)
And, he would probably tell the people "When in Rome, give Caesar his due."
He'd veto the social programs in favor of educating the masses.
2007-10-23 11:40:21 · answer #3 · answered by Doc 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
War.
But here's the distinction: Jesus and CHRISTIANITY have next to nothing in common. If you want a religion that's about Jesus, we will have to create a new one called Jesusanity (although the Unitarians and Quakers have made a noble effort.)
2007-10-23 11:56:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Politicians.
2007-10-23 11:27:37 · answer #5 · answered by Mogollon Dude 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He was a mortal man who died 2,000 years ago. There's nothing left of him to veto anything.
2007-10-23 11:27:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm pretty sure he wouldn't veto healthcare for poor children. Where are the "compasionate" conservatives?
2007-10-23 11:25:51 · answer #7 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Definitely NOT SCHIP!
“When Jesus Christ asked little children to come to him, he didn't say only rich children, or White children, or children with two-parent families, or children who didn't have a mental or physical handicap. He said, "Let all children come unto me."”
2007-10-23 11:25:31 · answer #8 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Tax exemptions for Church's that involve politics.
2007-10-23 11:26:49 · answer #9 · answered by edubya 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
46 Billion for more war
2007-10-23 11:23:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋