She had her chance to apologize to Mutts @ Moms, but danced around the whole thing. She still just does not get it.
2007-10-23 04:08:26 · 16 answers · asked by Anne2 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television ➔ Talk Shows
sick people care about dogs without homes but care not about babies without homes
2007-10-23 12:46:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think the woman from Mutts and Moms are just being mean spirited and wanted to prove that Ellen is not special just because she is a star. What they did was break a child's heart. What difference does it make who has the dog as long as it's in a loving home. She already apologized and took responsibility for making the mistake. Everything that happened after that point was spiteful and small minded. "The I'll-show-her syndrome."
2007-10-23 04:16:25 · answer #2 · answered by darkdiva 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think Mutts and Moms were wrong as well. They should not have taken the dog away from a family that seems to have loved it and would have taken good care of it. They should have checked out the home first. They have damaged their own reputation as well. Would you adopt an animal from them knowing that at anytime they could come and take the animal back for any reason.
2007-10-23 04:15:18 · answer #3 · answered by London Catlover 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
each and each action picture star has a ton of followers, all of them have haters. There are people who for the era of all possibility hate Ellen by certainty of her life-style, confident even in 2012 some people do now not rejoice together with her sexual orientation. there are in all possibility some that hate her for her achievement, jealousy brings a spectacular style of hate. there are quite a few diverse themes as properly maximum in all likelihood and that i'm able to think of of of a minimum of a pair of celebrities that do significantly better good then Ellen does and that i understand they have better haters then Ellen ever will.
2016-12-15 07:19:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've adopted 3 cats from Rescues. I decided a long time ago, if I wanted to give them away, I would. Mutts & Moms just proved my thinking is correct and I SHOULD lie if and when I need to. It's a control issue and that's the bottom line.
2007-10-23 04:21:11 · answer #5 · answered by leoleowyatt 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ellen made a mistake and I think she apologized to the family that was wronged in this whole mess.
2007-10-23 04:21:31 · answer #6 · answered by Pugmama 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She really shouldn't have to apologize in my opinion. It is so hard to adopt pets into good homes or any home for that matter so she gave it to a good family, big freaking deal. She did them a favor, you don't see her asking for the $2,000 she spent on a dog that they kept. They should be ashamed. Setting their adoption age at 14 is stupid, I could see under 4 but they are crazy, no wonder there are so many dogs in shelters.
2007-10-23 04:49:33 · answer #7 · answered by ♥Jen♥ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My advice - it's over, it's done with, let it go and move on. In the beginning this was of interest. Now it's just boring and repetitive. What can be said at this point that hasn't already been said.
2007-10-23 09:57:18 · answer #8 · answered by elyag43 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with the others BOTH parties are to blame
now the dog is suffering because of it not the kids....
2007-10-23 05:47:09 · answer #9 · answered by muffett1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
honestly, i think both sides kinda stepped on their collective kranks if you ask me. Both are in the wrong to some degree.
On a further note, who really cares, anyway?
2007-10-23 04:11:24 · answer #10 · answered by Shredded Cottage Cheese 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋