The Clinton presidency, Bill and Hillary was one of the most corrupt in recent history, the scandals were mind boggling and caused the white house to devote all their time on trying to keep Bill Clinton from being impeached. GOOGLE: Whitewater, Jennifer Flowers, Vince Foster, Paula Jones, Travel Gate, and Campaign fund fraud, that is enough to disqualify her and should have prevented her from being elected to the US Senate.
2007-10-23 03:22:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It has nothing to do with her being a woman. I couldn't care less about that. It has everything to do with the fact that she's an ultra socialist posing as a 'moderate'. Her husband did the same thing when he was campaigning and after he won the election suddenly realized that he could not deliver on his moderate promises. It was all a lie. But the memory of the voting public is short so the trick works again and again. So, the fact that she says anything to anyone depending on she believes they want to hear and as a result, her real convictions are not known. But her actions are and all of her actions reflect her socialist agenda. This is bad for a couple of reasons. First, socialism is very bad for the economy. It saps the resources from the engine of commerce and 'punishes' the most productive and successful in society. As a result, socialism is great for her constituency since her constituency is not the ones that will be footing the bill for her social programs. And those that do foot the bill gain nothing from those programs as they can provide everything she's giving out for themselves.
2007-10-23 10:27:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by The emperor has no clothes 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Choosing a leader based on gender is not the way to go. I could not vote for Hillary Clinton for many reasons.
She says she's "moderate" when indeed she's a flaming socialist.
She is power hungry.
She is an angry woman.
She is not a promise keeper.
She has an ethically shady background in business.
She promotes universal health care which would be a disaster.
Her socialist agenda would raise taxes to new heighths.
She has poor "people skills"; her public personna while campaigning is rehearsed, rehearsed, rehearsed.
She's so negative, even her husband doesn't like her.
2007-10-23 10:22:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by missingora 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I have no problem with a woman being president but Hillary is not the one for the job!! The people above me have just about said it all, with a couple of exceptions like Bob F!! It is very scary to me to think of Hillary getting into the Presidents seat!! Not good for America, period!!
2007-10-23 13:55:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ginny 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, it's not because she's a woman. It's because of her views. She is also constantly reinventing herself. Why is she doing that? How can you ever know what she's all about. I don't believe she is a person of good character. When her husband was president, a popular quote was, "Character doesn't matter". It certainly does.
"Our characters are a result of our conduct." Aristotle
I just don't believe she has our nation's best interest at heart. It seems that she only wants to be president for herself. I'm not sure that most of the people running are running for any other reason than themselves. I do like Ron Paul, however. He seems to have the character that most who are running lack. Go on the candidates websites and try to decipher the rhetoric for yourself.
2007-10-23 10:32:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"conclude that the Lyndon Johnson-era federal antipoverty programs did not go far enough in redistributing wealth among the American people" = Marxism
In 1969 Hillary Rodham wrote her 92-page senior thesis (titled "There Is Only the Fight": An Analysis of the Alinsky Model) on the theories of radical Chicago organizer Saul Alinsky, whose activist tactics and strategies she greatly admired. Ultimately, Hillary's investigation of Alinsky's methods and ideals led her to conclude that the Lyndon Johnson-era federal antipoverty programs did not go far enough in redistributing wealth among the American people, and did not give sufficient power to the poor.
When Hillary graduated from Wellesley in 1969, she was offered a job with Alinsky's new training institute in Chicago. She opted instead to enroll at Yale Law School, where she was strongly influenced by the radical theoretician Duncan Kennedy, founder of the pro-Marxist academic movement known as critical legal studies.
One of Hillary's Yale professors, Thomas Emerson (known as "Tommy the Commie"), introduced her to Charles Garry, who helped her get personally involved in the defense of several Black Panthers, who were then being tried for the torture, murder, and mutilation of one of their own members. Hillary's work for the Panthers earned her a summer 1972 internship at the Berkeley, California office of the Stalinist attorney Robert Treuhaft.
Read more at the link...
2007-10-23 10:17:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
all she knows how to do is blame others for the way things are going and she never offers what her solution would be,she only wants power and does not care about the interests of the common people,a long time ago when her husband was in office she was quoted as saying that the american people need to learn to sacrifice which also leads me to believe that she has no idea how real people in america live
2007-10-23 10:27:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by san_ann68 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
She wouldnt make a good president. Voting for or againts a person based on gender or race is the WRONG reason to vote. If you do not know the issues, research them and what their true impact will be and then vote, if not, stay home.
2007-10-23 10:16:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Baby killer, lesbian, no morals, everything currupt you can possibly have in a president, and dont forget PMS! Beware of armageddon every time it is that time of the month. She will be against war one day and will bomb or gas out our own people the next. Beware! must be the SEASON OF THE WITCH!
2007-10-23 11:08:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Led Zeppelin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
She is using National Health Care as an issue, after receiving "influence money" from HMOs to kill the idea during her husband's presidency.
2007-10-23 10:35:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Darth Vader 6
·
0⤊
1⤋