2007-10-23 03:06:19 · 20 answers · asked by Spartacus 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, I don't think the rest of the world would appreciate being nuked.
2007-10-23 03:21:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
All of Bush's distant places coverage judgements have been an unmitigated disaster for this united states and the international. None of those terrible acts would have been performed via any of the applicants. in spite of the fact that if is is putting bases and hobnobbing with dictators interior the former Soviet Union, to leaving at the back of the Geneva and Kyto and Anti-ballistic treaties to ignoring Bin weighted down which brought about 9-11, to the finished failure to any non violent family members interior the midsection East, the withdrawal of Syria from Lebanon, the promotion of nuclear technologies for Mangos in India, for doing not something on commerce with China. yet via a methods, the homicide of million Iraqis is actual the excellent of Bush errors and one which marks him as between the worst presidents interior the historic past of our united states. all of the applicants will pull out troops. some applicants want to depart some troops in, besides the incontrovertible fact that it could be a small tension. Biden's physique of ideas for federalism is now looking like the only reasonable answer. not one of the Democrats will start up a warfare with Iran. on the different hand, Bush is for invading Iran. He won't, by way of fact he realizes he's merely too inept and has lost all his political help. He has no militia sense, no technique, no diplomatic skills or information of the individuals or historic past of the area. he's an utter failure on his very own words, and the individuals of the midsection East hate him and would never enable him or his surrogates to rule.
2016-11-09 06:57:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem is we really don't know much about the way any presidential candidate thinks. These people will say anything to get elected. Look at how many Republicans with a history of liberal positions are now trying to prove how their positions have changed and how ultra conservative they are. The Democrats are no better.
The Republicans all portray themselves as religious fundamentalists but who knows what goes on behind the scenes. I don't trust any of them.
One day I hope moderated voters will wake up and take the government back from the leftie wackos and right wingnuts.
Practice term limits. Vote against all encumbents.
2007-10-23 03:14:46 · answer #3 · answered by wooper 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Depends on what part of Revelation you are referring to. However, I would rather have a candidate that has foreign policy experience, or is open to communicating with our foes in hopes of coming to a peaceful relationship.
2007-10-23 04:28:43 · answer #4 · answered by Lisa M 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You speak in hyperbole to make GWB look like a fool. In doing this you expose your ignorance of both Christian people and Jesus Christ. Being guided by Biblical principles doesn't mean Bush consults the Bible like an oracle.
Frankly, I'm thankful that we have a Bible believing, confessing Christian in the White House right now. My worry is that right now, we don't have anyone like that in the running.
2007-10-23 03:41:35 · answer #5 · answered by cornbread_oracle 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't worry near so much about Revelations, it could cause some caution but Pat Robertson Hell no
2007-10-23 03:15:57 · answer #6 · answered by CFB 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Anyone who follows the Lord is on the right track.
Pat Robertson is not for me to judge.
2007-10-23 03:25:23 · answer #7 · answered by missingora 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
We know one thing Bush would listen to real experts on foreign policy guess Jerry, Pat and gang of Bible experts knew more than the state department.
2007-10-23 05:08:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, we already have a president who appears to be taking directions from Deuteronomy, and that hasn't worked out very well:
"When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. . . . This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to the nations nearby." Deuteronomy 20:10-17
2007-10-23 03:14:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Yes
2007-10-23 03:19:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Directions? I don't think so. The rev may suggest something, but it beats the hell out of socialist agendas and NO belief in God!
2007-10-23 03:15:29 · answer #11 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋