My ex husband and I have a court order saying for my ex to have supervised visits (Teachers watching him but doesn't say that in court order just says "Supervised" he can visit from 2-5 at the daycare (where i WAS working) with a call from him 24 hours before he wanted to visit. We did that for about 8 months, then my oldest started Kinder, and he wasn't gettting out of school till 2:30. I had to leave work at 2, *VERY HARD TIME GETTING OUT* and then I had to come back and both my kid's were there in daycare till 5:30. My boss gave me a really hard time so she said it would be better if I change my hours till 2:00. So I was like um okay. So, I sent him a proposal to visit at mc donalds from 3-5 due to my scheudle change and oldest kid being in school, and for me to supervise him or someone I can find that might want to. He SIGNED IT AND I SIGNED IT, both have copies. He has done so for a year, no problems. He only comes 1-2 times a month though. Wasn't this a good proposal?
2007-10-23 02:48:48 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Yes, it it's worked out for so long, it was a good proposal. It's too bad he's not coming more than 1-2 times a month, but it seems to be working, so you should keep it up. It isn't a binding agreement, since it's not a court order, but I like to see parents who can work out changes to visitation without going to court. My aunt had to go to court to switch visitation weekends so my ONLY cousin could come to my wedding. The husband refused, and a courtdate was set after the wedding. It sounds like both of you are doing good things for your children rather than harboring bitterness.
2007-10-23 02:57:23 · answer #1 · answered by smartsassysabrina 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The agreement must be approved by the court in order to be valid and enforceable.
2007-10-23 09:57:03 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋