That the results of the hair and fluids have come back "inconclusive" as to whether Madeleine was alive or dead and that "traces" of Madeleine were found in Murats house.
Is this where the cover up begins in earnest.
2007-10-23 00:38:15 · 25 answers · asked by trancebabe 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Oh Murat the scapegoat coming back under the spotlight now?
This stinks of a cover up, yes, as we heard his "argiudo" status was about to be lifted.
Its probably come from above to sort it making someone less well connected the villain.
*edit* Theo the link is here
2007-10-23 00:42:49 · answer #1 · answered by !Lady Stormy! 5 · 11⤊ 5⤋
The PJ did say in a televised interview early on, that there was evidence against Robert Murat, just not enough. It has stuck in my mind as being one of the very few pieces of information with a reliable source.
I'm not saying he is involved in Madeleine's disappearance, but he possibly had something else to hide, as his alibi was said to be questionable.
I wonder why after all this time he's still an arguido. Could it be possible that the police are using the same tactics as they did on the McCanns -releasing the information that he's not a suspect, simply to make him drop his guard?
2007-10-23 08:38:52 · answer #2 · answered by Netty 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well it doesn't surprise me anymore..I wonder what Gordon Brown whispered in the Portuguese PM ear the other day ?I feel for the Portuguese police.This whole thing makes me sick.
Edit ..I read in one of the papers yesterday that the police still think Maddy fell down the steps outside the flat and was discovered by Gerry who then roped Murat into helping to hide the body..... possibly in his house until they hired the car and took it further away. If this is true why would the Mc's and friends try to implicate Murat? Unless of course Jane Tanner really did not know what was going on and she really did see Murat taking the body towards his house. But that still doesn't answer why Gerry would go along with snitching on an accomplice.
2007-10-23 02:16:15 · answer #3 · answered by little weed 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
The whole thing has been a shambles from the start - just one major **** up after another, even if they do 'solve' the case, will anyone really believe it has been solved. It seems like the PP suspect someone then attempt to fit the evidence around them - crazy system. Because they suspect Murat and the parents they now seem to want to connect them regardless of the evidence.
2007-10-23 01:07:43 · answer #4 · answered by Dr Watson (UK) 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe a word of any of it.If any evidence was to be found,it would of been found a long time ago.They are not going to 'suddenly' come across it now.Murat is a suspect for a reason the same as the McCanns but,I don't think he is involved or that any evidence has been found.
The media is just getting misinformed tips and trying to sell papers.As for the fluids and hair,they did say at the very beginning that they were so minute they would more than likely be inconclusive.It's hard to understand any of it.
2007-10-23 02:42:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
i don't be attentive to, yet i be attentive to that the PJ have been waiting for those effects for an prolonged time now. I study someplace that the outcomes have been going from the DNA labs to the British government, then directly to the Portuguese government, then to the PJ. It baffles me that 2 Governments ought to make certain those effects before the people who easily want them do, and it makes me ask your self what the outcomes say. i think of it relatively is approximately time that the PJ have been given the outcomes regardless of the undeniable fact that, so they're in a position to take despite action they could desire to, no remember if it relatively is clearing the McCanns, or soliciting for that they return to Portugal for greater questions.
2016-10-07 11:02:46 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wasnt it said when the child first went missing,that several people including Murat were in the apartment.
Contamination and all that stuff could have been transported to any of them, dont you think
2007-10-23 01:10:50 · answer #7 · answered by Rosebud 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
if the results are inconclusive why does the gov and other officials need to see before the pj?. i think this is all an effort to side track the public. the 'traces of madeleine in murat's house' i also think this is just smoke screen....in the initial phases when murat was the focus of attention and his house was searched, nothing was found and i still believe this is all a way of guiding our attention away from our focus.
2007-10-23 01:01:05 · answer #8 · answered by daisy 6 · 7⤊ 3⤋
IF this is true and the press isn't just making stuff up again, we may have caught our kidnapper! Why would any of Madeleine's DNA be in the house? She and her family were never there, nor were anything belonging to her.
2007-10-23 11:39:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Havent heard that where did you hear it from? Read that Kate only left the table once to check on Madeleine, and that was when she found her missing.
2007-10-23 06:53:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋