English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A top officer at the National Institute for Forensics Medicine has also confirmed that tests were performed on residues that were collected in the house and from the vehicles of Robert Murat by PJ inspectors and confirmed that there is a possibility that the body was hidden there.

http://www.24horasnewspaper.com/mostranews.php?id=7944

http://forums.mirror.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=22974

Your opinion? Thanks

2007-10-22 23:45:10 · 12 answers · asked by toietmoi 3 in News & Events Current Events

Of course he is innocent until proved guilty and of course these are only speculations like the rest of the misinformations surrounding the McCanns.

2007-10-22 23:47:17 · update #1

12 answers

It goes to show that people should stop speculating on this case, especially those who are baying for the McCann's blood, and just let the people investigating it get on with it.

2007-10-22 23:49:31 · answer #1 · answered by 6 · 2 1

Ha Ha Ha LOL Toi-et-moi you must be getting desparate quoting from the old Pro-McCann demons, '24 Horas' and 'The Mirror Forum'... sorry I had to laugh at that one.

I put re-pursuing Murat down to wishful thinking. Though I'm still not convinced that he does not have links in some way with a couple of the 'Tapas 9'

2007-10-23 15:34:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Is this the same type of DNA evidence that condemned the McCanns but was shown by the McCanns to be inconclusive.

Can it now condemn or be equally inconclusive where Murat is concerned?

2007-10-23 07:26:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Everyday something new.. It puts me in mind of the program "the thin blue line"
I wish they would just do something, either find some evidence or don't, Accuse someone or don't, Get the forensic results or don't....but stop fannying around!!

2007-10-23 07:05:37 · answer #4 · answered by Charley 4 · 4 0

Not confirmed half way down the article. And not certain if from a live or dead body.

2007-10-23 06:51:14 · answer #5 · answered by !Lady Stormy! 5 · 4 2

I cant see the point of asking a question if all you do is disagree with the answers

2007-10-23 10:43:21 · answer #6 · answered by charlie 6 · 1 1

they searched his villa, there would of been obvious evidence of a body having been there

2007-10-23 06:48:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

deep down they still think it is the mccanns.

2007-10-23 06:54:20 · answer #8 · answered by steven e 7 · 5 2

Forget it. His innocent and everyone knows it.

2007-10-23 07:37:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Isn't it strange that those who "seek justice for Madeleine" are so silent when the finger is pointed at anyone else other than her own parents?

Surely it couldn't be be that personal dislike is stronger than one's search for justice?

2007-10-23 06:55:01 · answer #10 · answered by Faith 6 · 7 5

fedest.com, questions and answers