I thought that it was their job to judge peoples performances on the X factor and whether or not it is 2 acts from the same category to get the chop, the judges should be professional enough to choose.
I think Sharon was performing a publicity stunt so that she gets money to give her story on what happened. Its pathetic.
She should just get on and do what she is paid to do.
What do you think???
2007-10-22 20:50:14 · 24 answers · asked by Brunettebeauty 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television ➔ Reality Television
I agree I personally thought her behaviour was totally OTT,
the way she acts is a bit bizarre and I think she is ver y fake and condesending to all the acts and I hate the way she calls all the girls Mrs it bugs me,i think she ll be doing the remaining girls a favour if she quits she is only in the show for fame not for the right reasons like being a mentor and making the most out of the girls i mean emily was a disgrace on sat i felt her song choice for her was totally wrong and she could almost have got the boot for it
2007-10-23 00:22:01 · answer #1 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think Strictly Come Dancing is giving them a run for their money so they are pumping up the publicity machine. This so-called feud between SO and DM is much more interesting, but they don't seem to be going into any details about it so it must be true!
Remeber in the first show when LW was sacked then 'dramatically' asked back? It's all such a load of crap. I can understand her refusing to vote, which actually makes more sense because the votes won't be split then, buto walk off the show and jepordise her £million quid contract? Nah!!
2007-10-22 21:38:24 · answer #2 · answered by Hatters 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Really,I don't even understand why,I mean she had done the show for the past 3 series she knows how it works,I mean why throw a strop now,although this may be true,I don't know if she will really end up going after mentoring her acts for such a time,plus remember Louis did this sort of thing last year or the year before I think but he came back.
2007-10-23 04:05:45 · answer #3 · answered by Classy Clarissa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I like to see both sides of the coin so to speak. Yes she should have been professional but Sharon is sensitive and she feels for the people she is mentoring. It was an intolerable position for her to be in to have to chose between her two protegees. Also the public didn't get to see Kimberley perform (and therefore vote for her) because the powers that be started the programme earlier than advertised thus cutting out Kimberley's performance for the majority of us. It was this that upset Sharon also because she thought Kimberley had been unfairly treated.
2007-10-22 21:08:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I think it is a publicity stunt to get the viewers away from Strictly Come dancing "Will Sharon turn up" type of thing anyway tune in to Paul O'Grady today he is interviewing her tonight at 5pm!!!
2007-10-22 21:27:13 · answer #5 · answered by momof3 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I read in the paper yesterday that before they went onto the results show, Sharron and Danni had a massive argument and that had something to do with it. I agree also tho that yes it was a publicity stunt. Love Mrs O tho!
2007-10-22 21:15:43 · answer #6 · answered by Loo-loo 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I agree and I really hope it backfires we could do with less exposure to her, she's a wrecker & what happens to her when a young bloke comes on, praps poor old ozzy is not doing the business
2007-10-24 06:34:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Totally agree
2007-10-22 20:53:39 · answer #8 · answered by Prince By Tor 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Got to be a publicity stunt. Show gets coverage, everyone tunes in next week to see if she shows up.
Louis Walsh did this before.
All PR is good PR.
2007-10-22 21:06:42 · answer #9 · answered by helen t 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes i agree but i think most of it is done to keep the ratings
2007-10-22 23:24:49 · answer #10 · answered by Black Orchid 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋