maybe....I am a liberal....so his views would probably not be in line with mine....but he is doing a fairly good job in California
2007-10-22 19:47:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
top I do stay in California and he's our "governator", yet distinctive his modern-day judgements have been a tactics too liberal for my liking, as a registered self sufficient. even in spite of the certainty that, I do rejoice with distinctive his new suggestions and his skill to be triumphant in out to the two conservatives and liberals. he's bigger of a clever in maximum factors. So particular, if he have been even allowed to run for President (albeit the style prohibiting it), i might evaluate a vote for him.
2016-12-15 07:01:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only way I'd vote for him would be if he were running against Bush. (I know, I know...they are both Elephants and Bush can't run again, thank God, but that means I'll never have to vote for him.)
2007-10-23 07:47:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♪♫♪The♪♫♪ Duchess 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO WAY! all the presidential candidates are douches but he would be the STUPIDIST person to put into that position
2007-10-22 19:33:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sebastian 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Oh that's just what we need, a rich pompous movie star who drives a hummer in office.
2007-10-22 19:35:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by notsonormalgrl 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, if he was running against Hillary
2007-10-23 06:19:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by 'Old & Cudley' 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No way, that dude is extreme, to say the least- lol.
2007-10-22 19:30:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lynnette_is_a_Lovely_Latina! 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
He wouldnt get voted in but he'll "be bock"
2007-10-22 19:34:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Amanda 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes, I think I would
2007-10-24 09:49:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lori 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
its turbo times
2007-10-22 19:29:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Johnnyonthespot 3
·
1⤊
1⤋