Thanks to the other poster for bringing this to my attention.
I always suspected that she'd like to return all of us to eating out of trashcans and living on the streets.
Could this be the proof I've been looking for?
Has she considered how many children could be fed, how many tuitions could be paid, how much FREE HEALTH CARE could be given out for that amount of money?
This woman is ridiculous..........
I do believe this is proof that the other suspicion I've posted here before holds true, also.
If she wins, it won't be long before she goes back to wearing the hippie garb that used to earn her so much ire and repulsion at the Arkansas State Capitol!!!!!!!!
Birkenstocks, dirty unkempt hair, long skirts and love beads - and away we go!!!!!!!
2007-10-22 18:51:27 · 20 answers · asked by wider scope 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Drop a beer can there and be done with it.
2007-10-22 18:54:06 · update #1
Thank you, Bravo. Very nice....
2007-10-22 19:01:28 · update #2
OMG...This can't be true! And he says he didn't inhale! If she wants to do this SHE must have inhaled, AND still is. OMG...you've got to be kidding about this! WTF has this world come to?
LOL...I can't take it!
Oh yeah...EWE!!! I hate dirty unkempt hair!
2007-10-23 08:19:56 · answer #1 · answered by DesignDiva1 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't recall the particulars, but this is obviously a payback for a large campaign contribution from the guy getting the million. It looks like it will be stopped. I found this article about it.
http://www.hillaryproject.com/index.php?/en/story-details/hillarys_woodstock_funding_bill_stopped_by_republicans/
"...Sens. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., and Tom Coburn, R-Okla., were trying Thursday to strip the Woodstock earmark from a massive health and education spending bill on the Senate floor. Democrats moved to kill their effort, but Republicans won a key 52-42 vote - seeping with presidential politics - signaling the Clinton-Schumer earmark would soon be gone...."
"...It is part of a larger development called the Bethel Woods Center for the Performing Arts with a 16,800-seat amphitheater. The development was opened in 2006.
Billionaire Alan Gerry is the force behind the project. He and his family have contributed almost $30,000 to Clinton and a committee headed by Schumer dedicated to electing Democrats to the Senate.
Gerry is a longtime major political donor. The contributions - $20,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and $9,200 to Clinton's presidential campaign - came just days after the earmark was inserted into the legislation."
t is part of a larger development called the Bethel Woods Center for the Performing Arts with a 16,800-seat amphitheater. The development was opened in 2006...."
2007-10-23 01:58:45 · answer #2 · answered by bravozulu 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Without geting into a great big pissing match, I'm going to just say no- she's not justified. What's going to be next- the US Festival, or how about a statue of Bill Graham for the days on the green!
Crrrrrrrrrrrrrap!
2007-10-23 01:55:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
If she wants it so badly, then she can get the money through private donations. Being a Senator she still has to convince someone in the House of Representatives to introduce the bill. Personally I'd rather not have a publicly funded memorial to Woodstock.
2007-10-23 02:20:21 · answer #4 · answered by Mike W 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I can't believe she's the front runner. I admired her greatly when she was First Lady, but now she strikes me as a major nut job.
I truly hope Obama wins -- he's got ethics up the wazoo.
2007-10-23 02:01:58 · answer #5 · answered by The Snappy Miss Pippi Von Trapp 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Taxation is stealing. I don't desire anyone to steal my money to build crappola like this. Our local community raise taxes recently to build a damn water park for the kidies. I prefer the little turds do their water activities at their parents expense, not mine.
2007-10-23 01:56:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
All politicians like to spend the tax payers money.
It would be different if she had to foot the bill herself.
2007-10-23 01:54:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
her and Bill must have been smokin some good weed out there back then for her to be worried about some damn memorial...i dont get she should be worried about something more important she needs to help a more important cause...that woodstock thing a waste of money...and do she still smoke? i mean wats up with all that damn laughin she been doin on t.v lately?....hell i'll have some of wat shes havin
2007-10-23 02:01:08 · answer #8 · answered by geena l 2 · 6⤊ 2⤋
In Hillary's world everything she demands is justified. We just have to make sure she never gets in our world!
2007-10-23 02:00:47 · answer #9 · answered by Brianne 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
New York Pork.
2007-10-23 03:35:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Oh I thought you meant the Peanuts Character, she's been huffin' the scotch guard again
2007-10-23 01:57:23 · answer #11 · answered by left_sock_ missing 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋