Will this insanity ever end?? Our country is 9 trillion in debt already,where are we getting this money?? Will China and Japan own us lock,stock and barrel when they call in these debts--our children's futures look very bleak if this kind of ridiculous spending keeps on.
2007-10-22 16:52:33 · 26 answers · asked by Johnny Z. 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
To mr. Striker..I'm not a Democrat and do not support Clinton.Your "Alfred E Newman prez is the ONE who got us in debt-check out the facts before you blow your ignorant stack!! All you fools who think this is a righteous cause,wait till the doo hits the fan and this nation collapses in a economic implosion...LIBERAL...NO...WISE TO THIS PLAN....>YES!
2007-10-22 17:13:52 · update #1
Not for his war I wouldn't................but I sure as heck would 1- if I had the money & 2- if it was used to bring all our soldiers home now!! These are kids that his greed for oil is killing!! The highest deaths are 21.....20....22 years old . Think about it!!! Just get our troops out of there now!!! Johnny...I'm withya all the way on........wise to the plan. We're not all stupid!!
2007-10-22 17:28:45 · answer #1 · answered by PJ ~88~ FAN 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
If you're so concerned about fiscal responsibility, why don't you concentrate your efforts on the bloated entitlement programs that make up almost 60% of the budget, or how about all the pork that Congress authorizes? In case you haven't read the constitution, our national security is the government's #1 priority, everything else is fluff. Your concern for the $46 billion going to fund the Iraq war is disingenuous and shallow. If you were serious about fiscal conservatism, you'd focus your efforts somewhere else besides the military budget.
2007-10-22 17:16:38 · answer #2 · answered by - 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
"Bleak" would be a welcome feeling, if "dictatorship" and fascism werent so vivid and alarming. I'd take bleak any day
over detention centers and a suspened pres. election in '08 and god only knows what more evil lurks in the west wing.
PS
the DemoCrat control has only been since 2006. The neoCon republiConArtists were the leaders in charge, in command, for five years, long before the Dems got there. This crisis is laid right at the feet of the Fuhrer and his republiConArtists. Make no mistake about it.
PPS
"Striker" below here is perfect example of the fascist idiot mind out of control, bigoted, and obviously stupid.
2007-10-22 16:59:34 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
It's 46 billion 'borrowed' dollars. I keep having this feeling that Bush is totally mad. I mean 'King George' mad! It would take a demented man to think there actually is that much money available for a war that's already lost. Maybe even Cheney is afraid of this guy now, or egging him on so he can be removed. Cheney's not above doing that...the man is as cold blooded as Dr. Evil. Think of it...a mad man and a sociopath at the head of 'our' government! It give me the creeps!
2007-10-22 17:07:35 · answer #4 · answered by Noah H 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I think it's payday for Haliburton (and Cheney). They keep playing the 'support the troops scam-line'. Congress is so wimpy they can keep making the scam work.
I wonder if Bush will ever go after the guy who is responsibe for killing 3K Americans on 9/11?
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
- G.W. Bush, 9/13/01
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
2007-10-22 17:01:54 · answer #5 · answered by expose_neocons 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hey once WJ Clinton reveals where he hid the 2.3 trillion missing from the Pentagon budget maybe we have a chance.
He also put us in debt with the damn Chinese.
Dov Zakheim was CEO Systems Planning Corporation 1987-2001. He helped Clinton sell missiles?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dov_Zakheim
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/8/12/161533.shtml
then he became comptroller of the Pentagon 2001??
AG Gonzales had been investigating him.
Whatever the war chest needs I support it. New vehicles and better armor. More troops in Afghanistan, may be Caspian Sea if we send a bomb message to Iran. US knows where the plant is ... just one and what the Pres of Iran does is ?? He is pretty crazzy.
YES.
2007-10-22 16:59:53 · answer #6 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Perhaps You prefer to spend billions more to try and defend this country if we lose. Providing the funds to finish the job is far better than having to spend more to enlarge every police force in this country to combat terror cells. We have been lucky not to have to deal with bombings and other tragedies. Not to mention the honor involved in insuring those who gave their lives for this country did not die in vain like Nam.
2007-10-22 17:04:20 · answer #7 · answered by old codger 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Congress will and it will be by all the necessary votes. Many of which will cross party lines.
2007-10-22 16:56:42 · answer #8 · answered by rance42 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I say give the president as much as he needs to win the war in iraq. While we are at it lets also give him funding to take on iran and north korea. My only suggestion is that we could save some money in future wars against terrorists and terrorist supporting nations. We just tactically nuke them out of existence. Thats it, you support in any way, directly or indirectly any form of terror acts against our country our troops or our allies----we vaporize you and all of your people without mercy. End of problem. It is too bad we cant tactically nuke all of you wacked out bleeding heart vegan tree huggin libs... Thats just my opinion....
2007-10-22 18:29:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I sure don't want to give another cent for this war of lies & deceit.
2007-10-23 05:03:43 · answer #10 · answered by Scooter_loves_his_dad 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋