English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-22 14:13:43 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Baseball

8 answers

I think so. I've read and heard a couple doctors say that HGH is not prescribed for pituitary gland problems in adults, only for children. And supposedly the "doctor" that wrote his prescription for it is a dentist - an out of state dentist for that matter. Also, if it was prescribed for a legit medical reason - why didn't his insurance cover anything? Paying $25,000 out of pocket for medicine when I'm sure he has insurance that would cover at least a large chunk of that doesn't make any sense unless he's got something to hide.

2007-10-23 10:36:49 · answer #1 · answered by DoReidos 7 · 0 0

ESPN needs the purple Sox to win so undesirable they're now attempting to distract the Indians. i'm no longer particularly useful a thank you to react to this. On one hand I unquestionably have continually been against using overall performance improving drugs, and then on the different hand Byrd quit buying HGH while it grew to develop into unlawful. It develop into in all probability used to help him returning from his surgical operation in 2003 and that i do no longer in all probability think of it helped him(he throws eighty 4 MPH) yet he don't have bought it. basically a rapid be conscious to any purple Sox followers who say they might desire to have gained sport 4. He has no longer bought it on account that 2005. 2 years in the past. meaning it had 0 result on his overall performance. David Ortiz took over the counter supplementations.

2016-10-04 09:40:03 · answer #2 · answered by koffler 4 · 0 0

About as much as Barry Bonds is ???

All you clods in the Mid west, how does it feel to be manipulated with Media BS about a legal substance and have your hero smeared all over the media by it.

Sucks don't it ... Now tell all your little people to prove any law was broken, THERE WERE NO LAWS BROKEN. END OF STORY !!!

By the way, who is this mitchell ****** anyway. Last I checked, he is an ex gov. official. Needs a payday, so he acts as rumor control for wimpy selig, who isnt man enough to control her own league, she needs someone else to do it for her !!!

All actions not media spin ...

2007-10-22 14:39:17 · answer #3 · answered by rikfreese 3 · 0 1

I don't see why he would...It's a pretty clever story. Not something most people can come up with under pressure in a short amount of time.

2007-10-22 14:17:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's a good alibi, and it's hard making things up under pressure. If he really used them to gain an advantage, he would have said he didnt know or he thought it was "flaxseed oil" or one of a multitude of lame excuses.

2007-10-22 14:21:29 · answer #5 · answered by random person 4 · 1 1

Yup.

MLB already threw him under the bus and said they had no idea he was on it. He can talk about church and charity all he wants but he is now the same as bonds, palmero, giambi, etc.

Maybe thats why he was so good in game 4. LOL.

When it rains it pours Cleveland !!! Welcome to the national media scrutiny. CHEATER, CHEATER

2007-10-22 14:47:08 · answer #6 · answered by Jeseth 5 · 0 1

this is paul bryd we're talking about
he seems like too honest and good of a player to lie about something like that
so no i don't think so

2007-10-22 18:39:26 · answer #7 · answered by ♥ mimi ♥ 7 · 0 0

Knowing what I do about Byrd, the answer is a resounding "NO."

2007-10-22 14:23:01 · answer #8 · answered by James B 1 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers