2007-10-22 13:27:58 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Strict liability is imposed without PROOF of negligence (fault). The policy behind strict liability is that certain harms result from fault, but the manufacturers do such a good job of covering up their fault that in order to do justice, the law disregards the lack of proof and imposes the liability without requiring it to be shown.
2007-10-22 13:36:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Basically true -- depending on your definition of "fault".
It is liability without any intent, recklessness or negligent -- but something still had to go wrong for there to have been harm.
2007-10-22 13:33:55 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
FALSE-LIABILITY SOME FAULT...........COMMON SENSE THINKING
2016-05-24 21:21:46 · answer #3 · answered by syreeta 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you going to do any of your own homework?
True.
2007-10-22 13:31:57 · answer #4 · answered by raichasays 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋