Is this one of those stories about a story that Karl Rove is so well known for?
You know, a story about somebody else writing and article about something that incidentally changes the meaning of the original?
2007-10-22 13:28:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by oohhbother 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
No it only makes my position more valid. Many of us have felt for years that the days of being "teflon", non-stick, should be over for the Clinton's. My only hope is these do not disappear as the rest have.
http://www.truewordtoday.blogspot.com/2007/10/back-to-corruption.html
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-clinton17oct17,0,2244470.story?coll=la-home-center
http://www.fec.gov/info/PartyGuide/Chapter10.htm
The information is out there. Convictions no longer conspiracies. Finally.
OXY- if only... the reaction of the sitting President was what brought him to Impeachment, Perjury & Obstruction of Justice. Not the "I never had sexual relations with that woman" defense he played. If not for a blue dress complete with the pearl necklace... even Bill has been quoted would never even told his wife happened. Intent beyond incident.
2007-10-22 20:24:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Not at all. Business as usual with the Clintons, once again. We have known this lady since 1992. Nothing should come as a shock.
2007-10-22 20:38:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nope. Not unless you consider a deeper belief in the corruption of the democratic party and the Clinton political machine a 'change'.
2007-10-22 20:24:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by The emperor has no clothes 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
LOL.....Nope.....She's a crook. I've seen her as a crook from the moment they came on the national scene in 1991 and she has proven me correct every single day since.
2007-10-22 20:31:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
no, it is just another example of how crooked the Clinton's are. This is the tip of the iceberg. Don't worry though, all the libs will still support her and act as though nothing is wrong....just like they did with Slick Willie.
2007-10-22 20:24:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
No, not at all. This isn't going to get much of a traction.
And heck, as an Asian American, we went through this nonsense before in the aftermath of the Wen Ho Lee controversy, where we got our nationality, even patriotism questioned. I've had enough of that, and I don't want more of that nonsense.
2007-10-22 20:27:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Silverkris 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
No.
The Lunatic Right-wing Crackpot Party (i.e., republicans) have been making up phony "scandals" like this for 15 years. They even spent $70 million tax dollars and 6 years "investigating" their bogus accusations and came up empty handed. All they found out was that Bill Clinton likes BJs.
2007-10-22 20:23:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by obl_alive_and_well 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
Nope.
2007-10-22 20:22:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
3⤊
1⤋