2007-10-22 12:55:39 · 27 answers · asked by mission_viejo_california 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Who can say... I think it's all part of that "French surrender" mentality they so envy.
Did we crank up that terrorist making machine again? Dang it... Bad USA!!! There would be no evil in the world were it not for us.... BAD BAD BAD!
Coro... sooo the terrorists we are fighting now... Al Queda... they are not the threat? hmmmmm.... I thought that they were.... wow am I confused. Why do Libs think killing Bin Ladden will end all terrorism? Dismantling the car is just as effective as taking away the keys. Actually more effective. You can still "hot wire" the car (get a new leader). Take away the real important parts like tires and the engine... (their cash flow and the higher ups and their supporters... and then you have made an impact.
When was the last terrorist attack on the US again? Hard to argue with those results, huh libs?
2007-10-22 13:00:30 · answer #1 · answered by That Guy 5 · 5⤊ 8⤋
As opposed to what we're doing now ignoring them may be the better choice. We could do so much better at fighting the root causes of terrorism than just fighting the already existent terrorists. We aren't solving the problem by just attacking countries we need to use our financial and diplomatic capabilities and smaller scale attacks that are less visible and therefore don't actually create more terrorists to help solve the problem.
2007-10-22 13:16:31 · answer #2 · answered by UriK 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
the only people who might go alongside with promulgating the thought liberals help terrorists are actually not in straightforward terms from the christian far appropriate yet additionally have sufficient worldly products that they are able to inform the lesser off inhabitants to consume cake in the event that they can't have the money for bread.
2016-12-15 06:47:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is yet another silly red herring/strawman question that has nothing to do with any truth to the matter.
This self-identified liberal believes that you control or manage terrorism by not fear-mongering the whole country into overreacting (which is what Bush has pretty much done to sell his policies and take away civil liberities, but by taking a calm and rational approach to it and eliciting international cooperation---which is NOT what Bush and his people have done.
2007-10-22 13:16:12 · answer #4 · answered by Silverkris 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
You are making an assumption based on a false premise! Not all "Liberals" are stupid, in fact very few of them are what you indicate you think of them. They are more interested in finding ben Laden, than the Conservatives seem to be or have been in the past several years! Why is that? Just offering more money for his capture to people who fear for their lives isn't the answer, we must make a concerted effort to find him & bring him to trial for the crimes he has incited others to cause; not only in the U.S. but, in places around the world! He needs to be tried by the UN, thus keeping our U.S. hands clean as to his fate. It would seem to me that you are addressing your question to the wrong group of people!
2007-10-22 13:05:57 · answer #5 · answered by geegee 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
because back in the third grade their moms told them that if you just ignore a bully he or she will eventually stop bullying. difference here being sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me doesnt quite do the trick, cuz im pretty sure airplane bombs, and IED's are right up there with sticks and stones. i wonder how they feel about the monster under the bed.
2007-10-22 13:48:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Libs don't think that, thank you very much.
We just don't like being lied to.
And for the record illegally and unjustly invading a country that did nothing to us how does that prevent the next gen of Muslim extremists from being pissed off enough to want to strike back?
I might also point out that your conservative hero, Prez Numb Nuts, is the one who said on interview when asked about steps taken to find and captured Bin Laden, he said he doesn't really spend that much thought on it.
WTF?!? The guy who supposedly was behind 9/11, one of the worst and devastating attacks on US soil, and the Prez of US says he's not spending much thought on it?
Yeah, the US is MUCH safer with him at the helm.
2007-10-22 13:07:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Why do you GOP trolls keep trotting out this crap? Who has ignored them? Bush attacked Iraq, a hell hole of a country, true, that held no threat to us. In the meantime, he allowed Afghanistan to be put on the back burner, killed untold thousands of Iraqis, many of them civilians, decimated the fighting power of the world's greatest army, and returned nearly 4,000 bodies of brave troops home to grieving families.
The facility of all this junk you spew is that opposition to Bush's vanity war equals opposition to the war on terrorism. That's BS and you know it. Typical of the Republican ethos of the Big Lie.
2007-10-22 13:25:01 · answer #8 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
As a liberal, I tell you we don't.
This is just a conservative lie propragated by right-wing pundits.
However, I don't think creating more terrorists like Bush is doing is any solution.
2007-10-22 13:04:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
We ARE ignoring them, fighting a useless war in Iraq.
Liberals would like to send troops and police to places where real terrorists actually exist.
You have a problem with that?
2007-10-22 13:06:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋