I think his 91 IQ is hurting us more everyday...what do you think??
2007-10-22 12:49:53 · 12 answers · asked by Man of Ideas 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Report: President Bush Has Lowest IQ of All Presidents of Past 50 Years
In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute of Scranton, Pennsylvania, detailed its findings of a four-month study of the intelligence quotient of President George W. Bush.
147 Franklin D. Roosevelt (D)
132 Harry Truman (D)
122 Dwight D. Eisenhower
174 John F. Kennedy (D)
126 Lyndon B. Johnson (D)
155 Richard M. Nixon (R)
121 Gerald Ford (R)
175 James E. Carter (D)
105 Ronald Reagan (R)
098 George HW Bush (R)
182 William J. Clinton (D)
091 George W. Bush (R)
2007-10-22 13:10:46 · update #1
The entire academic budget for colleges is 13 Billion a year.....mmmmmm....just one idea to do with the money....course we could continue to go into the debt...........
2007-10-22 13:14:19 · update #2
no more than the last 46 billion did
2007-10-22 12:51:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
this is complicated to win any guerrilla form conflict the place the enemy is complicated to become conscious of because of the fact they merge with the final inhabitants. yet, i believe President Bush has made progression against the Islam extremists, and the area interior the middle east has better. Iran keeps to be a concern and that i believe will proceed to be so till the present regime is ousted. I additionally believe that if an purpose diagnosis is done regarding the middle east, the effect of President Bush's movements could be useful, in spite of the unfavourable happenings that are emphasized via the liberal press.
2016-10-04 09:31:18 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The "war on terror" is a marketing phrase.
You cannot win a war on concept. Certainly, you cannot win a war against hatred and violence by using more violence.
Bush wants more money for the US occupation of Iraq -- which has nothing to do with foreign terrorism. It's just the US getting involved in somebody else's civil war.
And the civil war in Iraq will take years, if not decades, before you see any sort of resolution.
But we cannot "win" in Iraq because we're not one of the sides in the civil war. It's like talking about whether an umpire will will the baseball game -- it's a meaningless concept.
2007-10-22 13:06:47 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No but it will certainly take away from those blood sucking social programs like SCHIP, Head Start and the rest of those Nanny State give away programs.
2007-10-22 12:55:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If you disagree with what this President wants to accomplish, might I suggest that you explain your argument and what you would rather do with the money instead of making yourself look like a 12 year old by insulting him.
2007-10-22 13:01:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
What he needs to wage is a war on ERROR!
How many deadly mistakes can he make in one war??????
If he spends it as badly as he spent the last several billion we are all in deep doo doo!
2007-10-22 12:54:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You realize that half of that will go directly into Dick Cheney's Cayman Island bank account for distribution to the other PNAC mafia members, don't you?
2007-10-22 12:57:10 · answer #7 · answered by obl_alive_and_well 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely. 46 is the magic number.
2007-10-22 12:53:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Do you think some Congressman's plan to delay until 2008 won't put our troops in harms way?
2007-10-22 12:54:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
And how do you know what his IQ is? If his IQ is so low, how did he possibly get a higher GPA at Yale than your war "hero" Kerry?
2007-10-22 12:52:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋