English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

HITLER was responsible for killing thousands of people...making him a murderer.

Well...
George W. Bush is responsible for millions of deaths...thousands of families that have lost a father, a mother...or both.

Does that not make him a murderer?

Or is he "special" because he is the president?
Is it considered "the right thing" because he is a political figure?
Because if that is your agrument, then so was Saddam! And Osama! In their countires, they were considered political figures...do our twin towers going down that horrible day was for the greater good?

If the law states that if a president commits murder...then he loses his presidency...then why is Bush still president?

"Because he has not actually killed them HIMSELF!"

...But he as good as did!
He ordered it to be done.

Whom agrees/disagrees?

2007-10-22 12:04:51 · 17 answers · asked by Megan 3 in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

It makes them all the same they have taken a life, remember God stated yield place to the wrath for vengeance is mine says the lord. some see war as not murder but saving a country, it's like a white lie is better than telling a black lie, theres no difference bot are lies but we like to label some things OK when its a lie in all.

2007-10-23 00:30:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Your quite uninformed, or you just interpret things (I won't dignify the question with the word facts) to fit your conclusion. The first thing wrong with your question is that you say that "Hitler was responsible for killing thousands of people." Your quite wrong here. Hitler did not kill thousands, he killed, oh I think it was around 12 million, just in concentration camps. Not to mention the appr. 60 people that died as a result of the Second World War.

Your second fallacy is that "Bush is responsible for the deaths of millions." I would love to see a source for that, because even the left of the left only says 600,000. Absolutely no one even accepts that number, the true number is around 100,000, though probably more now. But President Bush is not responsible for those deaths, most of those were Iraqis killing Iraqis. Armed soldiers fighting armed soldiers is not murder, however terrorists blowing up a marketplace in Baghdad is murder.

If you say there is no difference between war and murder or genocide than you are a damned fool. Legitimacy, and consent of the governed are only two of the things that separates criminals from Legitimate figures.

2007-10-22 12:41:14 · answer #2 · answered by asmith1022_2006 5 · 4 0

In your own way you are right when you talk about politicians.
But, most probably, you have seen, only one side of the coin, the tail end, whereas the other side is head (religious fundamentalism), which is more dangerous and have to be curbed with iron hand.
In my view, at least you get an opportunity to remove political murderers, but not those fanatics who understand only one language.
Tell me frankly as to how would you counter 9/11 like assault on innocent?

2007-10-22 23:49:43 · answer #3 · answered by ADS 5 · 1 0

I disagree, Hitler killed millions of unarmed innocent people to cleanse the world of Jews.....his desires, not mine.He was also responsible for soldiers fighting soldiers and this part is not murder, it's people defending their rights or the rights of others. Bush has sent us into a war to defend both our rights and the rights of Iraqis.Murder was the towers, all those car bombings in Iraqi, the genocide, those people were unarmed, not expecting it and unable to defend themselves.....Basically terrorists murder......and militaries defend. I find people like you exceedingly annoying, learn all your facts and think to yourself what would I do in this situation before you go about trashing the people who are fighting for your rights, peace of mind and your freedoms.

2007-10-23 00:27:29 · answer #4 · answered by ͏҉ ßõhrçmrïñsÿ★ 6 · 2 0

I disagree.

Hitler ordered people rounded up and killed.
Thus, he is a murderer because he ordered the deaths.

Bush sent people into a war zone -- which Congress approved -- but it's a volunteer military. And Iraq is engaged in a civil war, so, if people choose to kill each other, that's not directly on him.

Bush didn't order anyone directly killed (that we know of) -- other than through military action between nations -- and that's a very different context than rounding civilians up from their homes.

2007-10-22 12:22:14 · answer #5 · answered by coragryph 7 · 5 1

§ 891, Article ninety one. Insubordinate habit -- the thought of insubordination is maximum oftentimes linked with armed forces companies, as armed forces companies have a chain of command and lawful orders given by making use of a commissioned officer (CO) or noncommissioned officer (NCO) are predicted to be carried out by making use of the guy to whom the order is given. Refusal of a armed forces officer to obey his (civilian) superiors could additionally count quantity, regardless of the undeniable fact that throughout some countries the top of the government is (a minimum of technically) additionally the main greater appropriate officer of the armed forces (see for example Commander in chief). § 918. Article 118. homicide - is the unlawful killing of a human guy or woman with malice aforethought. homicide is ordinarily sought after from different styles of homicide by making use of the climate of malice aforethought and the shortcoming of lawful justification. All jurisdictions, historical and present day, evaluate it a maximum serious crime. maximum jurisdictions impose a severe penalty for its fee. § 919, Article 119. Manslaughter is a criminal term for the killing of a human in a trend seen by making use of regulation as much less culpable than homicide. it relatively is totally real interior the regulation of homicide, the place homicide demands the two the motive to kill, a physique of strategies stated as malice or malice aforethought, that could contain an unintended killing yet with a willful brush aside for all times. § 889, Article 89. Disrespect in the direction of greater appropriate commissioned officer

2016-10-07 10:18:14 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

And just where is the systematic torture, and murder of a particular ethnic group in all these "millions" of murders?

If you are going to compare someone to Hitler, make sure there is a comparison, or you just look like a fool.

2007-10-22 12:31:22 · answer #7 · answered by You are all, weirdos. 3 · 3 1

These attempts to associate people with Hitler really show the immaturity and total lack of compassion for about 20 million plus murdered so called UNDESIRABLES.
STUDY actually study read books and watch real documentaries about these subjects and perhaps you will come to see the disrespect you do all those murdered in WW as well as all who fought and even yourself for comparing the 2.

Your daddy should spank you for this insolence

2007-10-22 12:21:30 · answer #8 · answered by CFB 5 · 5 3

As you stated, Osama attacked the twin towers. It is the responsibility of the president to defend our nation against attackers. All enemies foreign and domestic. As much as people don't like it, he is doing his job. We have'nt had a terrorist attack since 9-11-01.

2007-10-22 12:18:41 · answer #9 · answered by idaho69442 3 · 7 2

I suggest you drop the exaggerated drama and look the word up. If Bush is a murderer than so was Roosevelt, Truman, Lincoln, Clinton and many other presidents.

Bottom line, I disagree with your blather.

2007-10-22 12:17:10 · answer #10 · answered by The emperor has no clothes 7 · 7 2

fedest.com, questions and answers