They will tell you what they want you to know when they want you to know it. And you better get used to it.
Dissent is verboten
2007-10-22 12:03:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by CFB 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I can see lots of reasons why people would be uncooperative:
Smith amply and sympathetically documents Diana's precarious mental state and her need for sustained professional help...Despite entering an already overcrowded field, Smith has produced a well-written, evenhanded work. There is also, remarkably, still a bit of juice to be squeezed from this particular fruit. The world may have believed Diana was the "people's princess," but Smith unsparingly details how Diana let down almost everyone who knew her."
""Admittedly, some of the information about the Kennedy White House, and the deliberate way in which Jacqueline Kennedy modeled the social aspects of the administration on the French court, was shocking. After all, that court had met its quite deadly demise centuries earlier, so to ape its manners in the democratic United States appears unseemly.""
2007-10-22 11:44:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by oohhbother 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
stable question yet Millie already has the excellent answer. I merely would desire to upload that whilst he claimed to have balanced the funds bill borrowed extra money from Social protection than the three Presidents previously him did mixed, and the money become never paid lower back. Why do i'm getting the effect that Billy boy continually must be very severe to take excitement in a BJ??? wager Hillary did learn from the excellent, yet she does would desire to get laid, sorry for one in all those distrubing theory...
2016-11-09 05:34:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Ken Starr and $60 million could not come up with anything what makes you think there is something to uncover?
Why would anyone give records to someone writing an unauthorized biography, when they don't have to? Bush is refusing to give Congress records when they've been subpoenaed. Does he have something to hide?
2007-10-22 11:36:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by wyldfyr 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
Hitlery? Really? Is that what passes for clever in the minds of simpletons?
2007-10-22 11:58:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
"Hitlery", that's an insult to those who fought and died in WWII
and to those of Jewish descent whose grandparents survived the real Hitler and who would vote for her....
2007-10-22 11:42:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
"I don't recall."
What were the people who made "I don't recall" acceptable tying to hide?
That is more relevant and of greater importance today.
2007-10-22 11:39:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
2⤊
3⤋