Is any liberal concerned that hilliary has the highest rate of illegal contributions?

Answer 1

Nope, I bet they aren't! It's only wrong if a Republican does it...if a Democrat does it, it's perfectly peachy. And if St. Hillary does it - it's GOLDEN!!

Answer 2

Not really -- any liberals voting for Hillary would be doing so only as a last resort anyway -- since Hillary is predominantly socialist, the same as most Democratic leadership

Since liberals aren't choosing her other than as the lesser of several evils -- the fact that you think her campaign contributions don't comply with federal law is a very minor issue.

And BTW -- do you have any proof that her campaign contributions violate federal law -- can you even cite the federal law that you think is being violated -- or do you just not like some of the sources?

Answer 3

I'm just throwing this out there for people asking for more information regarding her fund raising and which laws she has broken. This case is shady beyond belief (see the second link for some rulings that just make you shake your head). Read the story, watch the video if you have 15 minutes to spare, and make up your own mind.

An excerpt from the story:

A business mogul who says he was Hillary Clinton's biggest donor in her 2000 Senate campaign is preparing to release a newly recovered videotape his lawyer calls "smoking-gun evidence" of the New York Democrat's commission of a series of felonies, each punishable by up to five years in prison.

Peter Franklin Paul, in a civil fraud suit filed against Bill and Hillary Clinton, claims the former president destroyed his entertainment company to get out of a $17 million deal in which Clinton promised to promote the firm in exchange for stock, cash options and massive contributions to his wife's 2000 campaign. Paul contends he was directed by the Clintons and Democratic Party leaders to foot the bill for a lavish Hollywood gala and fund-raiser prior to the 2000 election that eventually cost him nearly $2 million.

Sen. Clinton has claimed through her spokesman Howard Wolfson that Paul gave no money to her campaign, and her supporters have denied she had any anything to do with coordinating the August 2000 event or soliciting contributions directly from donors. Doing so would make Paul's substantial contributions a direct donation to her Senate campaign rather than her joint fundraising committee, violating federal statutes that limit "hard money" contributions to a candidate to $2,000 per person. Furthermore, knowingly accepting or soliciting $25,000 or more in a calendar year is a felony carrying a prison sentence of up to five years.

Answer 4

The sane liberals (they are synonyms so i don't be attentive to why I used the two words) are combating to treatment aids for everyone, by way of fact wager what; it would not merely infect homosexuals. Rape isn't all that preventable you be attentive to. you will get AIDS that way. And federal investment will help us detect a treatment quicker, for sure. until we DO detect a treatment its the governments accountability to surely attempt to look after its human beings and furnish condoms and the medicine that slows down HIV. you're merciless. you would be able to desire to discover the thank you to declare each sickness is preventable. Edit: confident, by way of fact third international worldwide places characterize socialism. Socialist Sweden is doing greater useful at controlling AIDS than capitalist u . s .. And that's not the main preventable sickness available, and it may surely be confusing to administration. you have have HIV for years and not be attentive to it. while you at the instant are not married, or you're merely a cheater, not something is preserving you lower back from having many sexual companions. you will not be attentive to you have HIV, and the virus will immediately unfold. And pondering how deadly that's, i think of we would desire to continually attempt to discover a treatment for it.

Answer 5

Tell us which ones are illegal. What laws were broken? If this is common knowledge to Rush and his cult, then I think something would be done about it. I think there may be a little jealousy going on here because she is getting a lot more than your Republican candidates. You think?

Answer 6

Sure. Hillary is a more Republican than Democrat. She's best friends with all the corporations. Wants to go to war with Iran, voted for the Patriot Act twice.

Answer 7

Yes, that's part of why I'm not voting for her. I think Obama and Edwards are both better Candidates than Senator Clinton.

Answer 8

No, not at all.
Any concerned about the treasonous outing of a covert CIA agent?

Answer 9

Not at all. Liberals will do anything to "win."

Answer 10

Nah Rudy has more that's why he's not disclosing his vetting system