2007-10-22 08:49:32 · 11 answers · asked by Spartacus 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I have a problem with someone who ignores science for religion, what if Pat Robertson calls and says we have to invade Iran because its the sixth sign of the apocolypse? And not because of US national interest.
2007-10-22 08:59:00 · update #1
Huckabee, Brownback ,Tancredo
2007-10-22 12:16:53 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney for sure, I don't know about Thomson. Romney's religion says the Garden of Eden was in Missouri.
Of course Brownback dropped out.
2007-10-22 15:59:10 · answer #2 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think that it is funny that creationists talk about observed phenomena as if it is something to believe in. Science is not something you believe or don't believe in, it is a process of obsersving the environment, making hypothesis' and test them, if it passes years of scrutiny, then it graduates to theory. Scientists are continuesly experimenting to test compenents of evolution, but nothing is going to actually disprove it as a theory, only certain components. It is too bad that most people can't think for themselves.
2007-10-22 15:59:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Brownback and Huckabee. Stay far, far away from them. Next, they'll be telling us they don't believe in the "theory" of gravity. ("Hey, it's only a 'theory'.")
Satan pulls dropped objects down to the ground to tempt the unbelievers.
2007-10-22 16:00:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Mike Huckabee- I actually respect him for voicing those beliefs- takes some nerve nowadays to admit to being a creationist.
I can't think of anyone else that is quite as vocal on the subject
Add: Is it really any one's business what these guys believe in? The presidency doesn't require a team of apostles to run it. And condemning someone for what they believe is hardly what one would call open minded, now is it? I would expect more form those that tend to lean to the right.
2007-10-22 15:54:41 · answer #5 · answered by tnfarmgirl 6 · 1⤊ 6⤋
None of them now. They are tripping over themselves to appear more conservative to get the religous vote.
2007-10-22 15:58:43 · answer #6 · answered by chelseablue 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Monkey see and monkey do. Two men took the baptist view in a debate, but, I forget who...
2007-10-22 15:54:53 · answer #7 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Not sure. But it's a national embarrassment.
2007-10-22 15:56:01 · answer #8 · answered by Earl Grey 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Is this a valid qualification for the Oval Office?
Are liberals turning into thought police? If you don't agree with their crap you're not worthy of holding office?
(How close can liberals get to fascists without actually being fascists?)
2007-10-22 15:56:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
All of them.
2007-10-22 15:59:37 · answer #10 · answered by jim h 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋