Sure, she's not perfect.
But don't you think that this country has been run by rich white men long enough?
2007-10-22 08:03:30 · 12 answers · asked by Summer 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Do you honestly agree with her espoused ideology?
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." --Hillary Clinton, 6/29/2004
"It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few...... And to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity." --Hillary Clinton, 5/29/2007
"(We) ...can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people." --Hillary Clinton, 6/4/2007
"We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own .. in order to create this common ground." --Hillary Clinton, 6/4/2007
"I certainly think the free-market has failed." --Hillary Clinton, 6/4/2007
"I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched." --Hillary Clinton, 9/2/2005
2007-10-22 08:10:04 · answer #1 · answered by Trollbuster 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
But the country being run by a rich white woman is acceptable? Open your eyes and ears and try not to let liberal ideology get in the way of clear thinking. This is an issue of leadership and sensible spending. It has nothing to do with The Ice Princess's sexual orientation. Hers is a platform of tax and spend philosophy. She prefers that the government handle all things. This, in turn, means that more funding will be needed for government programs/welfare. There is no provision for training people to learn job skills. I don't know about you but I believe in the time proven adage "Give a man a fish and he eats today, but teach a man to fish and he eats always". Also, she has never held a public office where budgets had to be planned and met. She also is weak on national security (doesn't have a clue). Kinda' scary huh?
2007-10-22 15:24:59 · answer #2 · answered by Dan K 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm tired of these stock sentiments based on notions of a Candidate or those lack of.
To show that you are a person of intelligence why not list the top three issues that are vital to you. Research and understand them; list them; and then provided the opposing Candidate's view and list why their views don't sit well with you.
I don't mean to take this out on you, but what happened to knowing the issues? What happen to serious debate?
To write off any of them is to express your generalization of the whole thing.
They are all rich. Color and gender at this level of the game is a thing of the past.
Let's talk substance here!
2007-10-22 16:00:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um- What makes you think putting Hillary in the oval office is going to change that?
Hillary is married to a rich white man and she's not exactly working class is she?
No, I don't think we need a rich,uppity you know what in the oval office.
2007-10-22 15:10:10 · answer #4 · answered by tnfarmgirl 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
now that question was both racist and sexist
did we not spend the last 40 years trying to avoid being racist and sexist
have we as a society not tried to make such behavior taboo?
race and gender are not and should not be qualifying factors in a presidential election
now for the candidate in question, she espouses the same views of the candidates you dislike for their race and gender
she supports the ideaology of a welfare state and a dependent populace and she voted FOR the war in iraq
her positions change as fast as the latest poll comes in
2007-10-22 18:32:05 · answer #5 · answered by 1 free American 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
And a rich white woman who's one of the phoniest people on Earth is a better choice?
2007-10-22 15:08:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Seriously...
It wont matter who's elected when God comes to destroy the earth.
Were supposedly living in the end times..
I keep hearing preachers saying the end of the earth is near.
I'm more concerned where I'll be heaven or hell for eternity.
Eternity is far more important than some stupid election.
2007-10-22 15:40:14 · answer #7 · answered by Digital One 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think ideology and character are more important than race and gender.
2007-10-22 15:12:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is not about race or gender. It is about who has the experience and vision to lead America, and I just don't believe she does.
2007-10-22 15:08:29 · answer #9 · answered by Leah 6 · 7⤊ 1⤋
LOLZ!
A female wouldn't make a difference.
2007-10-22 15:07:55 · answer #10 · answered by Jerry H 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋