Yes, but I am a huge fan of fiction - its highly entertaining.
2007-10-22 07:59:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Learning Conformity 5
·
5⤊
5⤋
LOL
1) Bill Clinton did provide the communist Chinese government with confidential nuclear technology.
2) 'A guy from Hong Kong' IS Chinese. Any human being that is 'from Hong Kong' is Chinese whether or not they are a communist. Any informed person would know that.
3) It's not so much that immigrant Chinese are contributing to Hillary's campaign, it's the fact that most of these contributors cannot be located and do not exist.
Now, as to point number three, it is impossible to validate every single contribution a politician gets. It's just odd that Hillary's war chest seems to have a grossly inordinate amount of illegal contributions both of the 'Chinese waiter' sort and the Chinese millionaire sort. Is there a connection? Perhaps. Perhaps not. But regardless, it does raise questions.
I also don't hear anyone calling her a communist. I do hear folks calling her an ultra socialist. I'm one of those people and the fact that she's a socialist is irrefutable. But communism is rather different from socialism. Still, I do find it very interesting and concerning that the Clintons, and the Clintons by an inordinate amount, get financial support from the Communist Chinese. I'm not sure why that is.
2007-10-22 08:11:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by The emperor has no clothes 7
·
5⤊
4⤋
Going to conflict makes u . s . greater money. whilst united statesa. is going to conflict they could borrow money from the mandatory financial corporation. In return the mandatory financial corporation gets those products of paper that relatively say I.o.u. additionally the owner of the WTC took out an insurance deal on the WTC. whilst the WTC is demolished the guy gets countless money. Many others have benefited off 911 Bin weighted down and suddam Husain's stay have been given worst after 9/11, suddam became into incredibly hung. they did no longer earnings from 9/11. The dumbest conspiracy concept?? No it may be the least dumb and maximum convincing conspiracy concept's i've got ever heard.
2016-12-18 14:35:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't forget that the Democrats are funded by George Soros, who is also a communist criminal, even though he donated millions to anti communist movements in Eastern Europe during the 80s. And there is always the ever so common "suspicious" deaths of all these different people who had "incriminating evidence" against the Clintons. The closer Hillary gets to becoming President the wilder these kooky conspiracy theories get. Let's just hope we can avoid wasting another $60 million+ on a special prosecutor investigating all these wild stories.
2007-10-22 08:10:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by wyldfyr 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
Well it is well known that Bill’s original campaign was tainted with money from China and it seems as though they are backing Hillary as well. That’s just the fact and there is no refuting them. How that money manifests itself has been through shady characters and back door deals. I think they should not allow foreign money to affect the outcome of our elections. Now with the Clintons living in the shadows leaves them open to public eyes. I think conspiracies touch on the truth, but are rarely based in reality, but there is some truth in all of them. I don’t think that the public has been any more or less fair with the Clintons. I do know that allot of time and money was waited trying to uncover the truth about a few issues and there are allot of mysterious deaths associated with the Clintons that are more then what I would consider to be normal. That is more then enough for me to be skeptical about their motives. I am not a Clinton basher or a hard core Conservitive. I am an all American Morderate and I like to call them as I see them.
2007-10-22 08:07:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Twigits 3
·
5⤊
3⤋
1. Never heard that theory but it sounds funny.
2. Aren't USUALLY fugitives donating money.
3. Never heard that one. Clinton did a lot to send work overseas and to the south. Of course Chines immigrants are donating money to Hillary, she will be sure they still export to the US and keep the jobs over there.
2007-10-22 08:17:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I don't think they PROVE anything... except that she has some explaining to do.
I'd love to hear her answer to it... but you won't hear that, because the media gives her a pass.
I'm curious to know what exactly IS going on with her and China. I'd love to know how it's a 'coincidence' that back during her husband's presidency, Gore got into trouble for fundraising at a Buddhist temple... what is the connection here?
I hate conspiracy theories and think conspiracy theorists are nuts... but where there's THIS much smoke, there's fire... so what IS the connection?
If you really believe there's NOTHING, then you're not thinking.
It's too much to be a coincidence... but making a decision as to WHAT it is... is premature.
2007-10-22 08:07:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative 3
·
4⤊
4⤋
I think last night on Fox before the debate when republicans - ordinary citizens were asked "do you think shes socialist - not just liberal" and some of the people put their hands up, when before they were jokingly saying yeah shes socialist, but when they were pushed on it for a real answer, most said no and left their hands down cause they're not stupid they know the difference between liberal and socialist,
these far right wing types are sorta scarey
2007-10-22 08:12:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Spartacus 3
·
4⤊
3⤋
Ironic, since China holds a great deal of our chits for helping to finance our bogus "war" in Iraq.
2007-10-22 08:01:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
i think they are getting more scared of her. hannity, today, was asking why obama and edwards were scared of her, and had to send their wives out to campaign against her. he kept asking how come he was the only one who would confront her and hannitize the clinton propaganda.
2007-10-22 10:45:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by tomjohn2 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can you imagine what would be accomplished if these people spent the same amount of energy on something productive as they do coming up with these ludicrous theories?
Therefore, we can blame them for everything wrong with the world. *nods wisely*
2007-10-22 08:36:31
·
answer #11
·
answered by Giliathriel 4
·
1⤊
2⤋