Hillary`s road to success means being able to con America`s underclass to fall in love with her and socialism......That`s how her kind works.........Her kind motivates the poor for her own personal prosperity.....and the poor lose in the end historically. She`s looking for postion......And the ignorant will help her if they continue to be lazy, politically...This is the pattern........Hillary is evil for America,people.
2007-10-22 07:39:26 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh please quit it Rudy!
2007-10-22 07:41:38 · answer #1 · answered by Learning Conformity 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
No, I did not realize that.
I never though of Hilary preying upon anyone.
I am not sure I understand the the rest of your statements, though. Try to make your sentences a complete thought next time.
I guess I also have a higher opinion of Americans than you do, since you say that she is preying on lazy Americans, conning the underclass, motivating the poor, and getting the ignorant to help her.
So, if I am reading your statements correctly, to you most Americans are poor, lazy, none too bright, and ignorant?
2007-10-22 07:50:29 · answer #2 · answered by Still Learning 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Socialism is bad?
Capitalism only works as long as the money is redistributed to the people somehow... Our economic policy for the last 40+ years has been to export labor and wealth to Asia so that corporations could become the new lords of a commercial feudal system... We are becoming a nation of financial slaves, unless something is done about the "free" enterprise system vampires bleeding our country to feed our "potential" enemies for a chance to hoard a pile of cash for themselves... I don't think Hillary or Obama are the answer, and they shouldn't be, the answer is EXECUTE GEORGE BUSH!!! Then it won't matter who the president is, they will do whatever they can to see that the will of the people is done, because they will finally know that they are accountable.
If you think that accountability would make either candidate a better president, see what I answered at http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AviIzBthg3hgeIShb7_TlPjsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071022110158AAtJc3t&show=7#profile-info-ISMWh4Zaaa
2007-10-22 07:56:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
That is what most democrats do in the first place. They want that so the vast public will be so dependent on them via handouts; free money, free education, and if they get out of hand they can stop all freebies and put them back in their place needing more since they are so dependent on the government they cannot do for themselves and will be in a rut.
That is why democrats in a majority love the amnesty bills. They know if they give, pretending to be kindness, legal citizenship to 20 million illegals that they will have a majority of those illegals legally allowed to vote for them then. And with Hillary's expensive healthcare plan she blatantly lied about how much it will be yearly, on top of her 5,000 dollar baby bonds for every baby being born, taxes are going to go through the roof. And the people with jobs and are able to take care of themselves and NOT have to rely on the government because of being lazy, jobless and uneducated, are going to have to pay through their paychecks for the uneducated lazy jobless slobs that did not take life serious and now paying for it in adult life!
This is how many dictatorships start. Promises of free stuff during a time of unknowing and basically laziness and they all grow dependent on the government. After all, what can a poor dependent nation do to a government afterwards? Not much. Basically all lose their voice after that.
2007-10-22 07:49:20 · answer #4 · answered by Fallen 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
George W. Bush failed to capture the main culprit behind the 9/11 attacks and instead focused on invading a country that was in no way involved in the attacks. He also can't utter a coherent sentence and he doesn't know where Wales and Kosovo are and was shocked to learn from the Brazilian president that Brazil has black people. What sort of people would support someone who is so dishonest and ignorant and intellectually lazy?
2007-10-22 07:51:31 · answer #5 · answered by tangerine 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
All politicians and pundits prey on lazy, unthinking Americans. It is also what Hitler preyed on--the lazy, unthinking masses. Think about it (if it isn't too much of a chore). People need to wake up and educate themselves. It is the only way our society will survive.
2007-10-22 07:46:49 · answer #6 · answered by Bryan H 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Uninformed and those who don't follow politics or understand really what she is running for. I cannot see how any clear thinking person would vote for her.
She stated, we are not capable of making decisions and she would have to make them for us. How many people listened or believed it?
She is evil, and power hungry. Many of the Chinese were pressured into funding her campaign, and many of those contributing don't even vote, or understand English!
2007-10-22 07:55:02 · answer #7 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lazy thinkers yes.. with technology. I think the computers did that.
2015-04-08 17:21:34 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
for one thing you are dead wrong, i happened to work for both bill and Hillary and they are both great people. it is not often that you can get two Rhodes scholars at the same time. bill Clinton was the only president who ever balance the budget and left the white house with over a trillion dollars in surplus. when asked by the press: when you are going to make a difficult decision who do you want by you side the vice president? no hillary was his reply. get your facts right.
2007-10-22 07:47:00 · answer #9 · answered by milton b 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
If only we could all be intelligent and mentally disciplined like conservatives. What an even-handed assessment of the electorate.
Is it possible that people actually disagree with your position (which seems to be uncritically anti-Hillary) without being lazy or stupid?
2007-10-22 07:44:45 · answer #10 · answered by David Carrington Jr. 7 · 7⤊ 2⤋
No. You mean like the Republicans prey upon the Religious Right?
2007-10-22 07:50:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋