2007-10-22 07:11:14 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because he is not Clinton,Gore or Kerry.
2007-10-22 07:14:17 · answer #1 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Because he wasn't Gore or Kerry.
Often we vote based on the lessor of two evils. I like what Mick Huckabee said last night at the debate. Hillary Clinton is no laughing matter. She is a danger to the Republic. She espouses fascist ideals.
We need to be concerted in efforts to end the bush/clinton hegemony. While I am no fan of any of the DNC candidates, the splitting that is occuring in this country need to be halted.
I see Hillary as the most divisive person in this election year. I foresee a civil war in the event she takes power. In fact I will be one that will call for it if we are too stupid as voters to stop her.
The internet for all it's good has been raising the specter of a 3rd party spoiler in the name of Ron Paul. We cannot let a rift occur among conservatives this go around.. Even if you LOVE Ron Paul, if he does not win the primary We must as conservatives remain solidified into one cohesive unit against Clintoon, UNLIKE 1992 and irregardless of whoever the front runner for the GOP is.
For all, Bush Jr is not running in 2008. It's time you get the friggin' idea..
2007-10-22 14:29:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't necessarily agree with everything Bush has done but he is a better option than either Al Gore or John Kerry, neither would have had the balls to attack Iraq, Gore would be worried that the bombs contributed to global warming and how could Kerry do anything after his testimony about Vietnam. If either of them had won the election we would all be speaking Arabic and our women would be wearing Burkas.
Like him or not at least you know that Bush does not back down to anyone, I respect him for that.
2007-10-22 14:29:29 · answer #3 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I have voted more Republican than Democrat and I can't stand Bush... he is such a disappointment that I can't even find the words to describe how disappointing he has been. If I said he was incompetent and stubborn and intelectually inept for that position I would still feel like I didn't articulate how bad he has been for this country.
2007-10-22 14:17:17 · answer #4 · answered by cattledog 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sorry, he is neither a good leader or a good republican.
On second thought, no I'm not sorry.
2007-10-22 14:17:23 · answer #5 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Neither one. He is a terrible person even if he was a Democrat I would still say , "HE is a complete a monster , and needs to be fired today.
2007-10-22 14:15:14 · answer #6 · answered by Nicki 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2007-10-22 14:18:38 · answer #7 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I don't like him because he's a
bimbo cheerleader with no brains.
2007-10-22 14:16:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I like him because he's a moron and he reminds me how far the US has fallen in choosing it's leaders.
2007-10-22 14:15:04 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
are those the only two options?
2007-10-22 14:18:33 · answer #10 · answered by bubba 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋