She really is. But common sense is not so common, so how do you expect idiots to recognize it. After all, didn't they vote for Bush?
2007-10-22 07:33:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Wiz 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Common sense is not part of Hillary's vocabulary! She's the biggest liar of them all!
Ron Paul is a nut case that can't win. Kucinich can't win either and he is strange.
The media report on the candidates that have a chance to win. They have that right. That's why all the meaningless candidates (e.g., Paul, Kucinich, Gravel, Dodd, etc...) are never discussed. If they were sensible candidates, they wouldn't be at the bottom of the pack.
BTW, Paul comes off as a kook because he wants to eliminate important parts of the government. His "get out now" policy for Iraq didn't go over well at the debate yesterday. He was the only candidate that got boos.
2007-10-22 15:05:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Old Hillary has alot of powerful friends and people to make her look good. Dont buy the hype. The most people friendly candidates dont get in because the industrial/ commercial businesses dont want them in. They spread lies about each other and twisted truths. Just go with your gut feeling most of the time is the best choice.
What kills me is the people who vote Republican or Democrat no matter who the candidate is. Hell might as well throw the Communist party in there. Be loyal to your party or you will die in hell. Crazy.
You know why they liked Bush so much? Because he is a moron and morons are easily swayed. At least he knows how to party. So do his kids LMAO.
If we could find a candidate who would just say, " We need to fight the oil companies and get things in this country back in control." You will see a landslide victory and then their assassination.
The greatest President ever was JFK cause he was smart and didnt let anyone tell him how to do his job. He knew what was right and he was killed for it. The new free world held captive by greedy billionaires who cant get enough money.
2007-10-22 14:13:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by analize2much 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
I've listened to both republican and democratic debates as well and I did not come to the same conclusion about Hilary as you did. I am, by no means, an insensible person. There are things I like and dislike about each candidate. In some ways I'm very liberal and in others very conservative so I'm trying to figure out who would do what's best for this country, both economically and morally. I certainly don't think Hilary is the person to do that job.
2007-10-22 14:16:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by grace 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
If a person rank orders the candidates without regard to party, the most unimaginable combination of 1-2-3 is the one you listed, Clinton, Paul, Kucinich, is the most preposterous.
If you like Clinton, it's unlikely you'd want Paul under any circumstances, and vice-versa.
By the way, if you don't like liars, what use could you possibly have for Clinton?
2007-10-22 14:30:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by open4one 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Never listen to the media. They're liberal and they change so many stories to fit their views. You don't hear as much about the Republican candidates and if you do all the newpapers and tv's are slamming them. Hilary is getting a lot of media because she's the first woman to ever run for president and her husband was in office 7 years ago but I wouldn't believe a word the media offered.
2007-10-22 14:10:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by violinnerd 1
·
3⤊
3⤋
She started off OK, until she became a female version of bush. She's more prowar than he is. If you like Ron paul, then you must have missed her latest votes. She's alienating her own party and pandering to her pocket book as she's suddenly changed stances on being anti-war and voted for the resolution to begin the ground work for a pre emptive strike against Iran!!!. She's laying the ground work for a war of her own presidency. No wonder bush likes her so much.
The only two decent and honest democratic candidates are Biden and Gravel and the only decent and honest republican candidate is Ron Paul.
2007-10-22 14:20:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by TJTB 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
Hillary doesn't make sense. Why did she make bill pardon a guy that then paid her brother hundreds of thousands of dollars? Why was she trying to help the Black Panther hate group that tortured and murdered innocents? Why does she fake a southern accent when talking to southern churches? The more you rely on finding your own facts rather than CNN's, the more you will feel duped.
2007-10-22 14:37:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by ryan c 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
"Sensible"?
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." --Hillary Clinton, 6/29/2004
"It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few...... And to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity." --Hillary Clinton, 5/29/2007
"(We) ...can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people." --Hillary Clinton, 6/4/2007
"We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own .. in order to create this common ground." --Hillary Clinton, 6/4/2007
"I certainly think the free-market has failed." --Hillary Clinton, 6/4/2007
"I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched." --Hillary Clinton, 9/2/2005
None of the above is considered "sensible" in America, comrade.
2007-10-22 14:04:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Trollbuster 6
·
6⤊
3⤋
The word woman associated with the terms Democrat and common sense don't make any sense!
2007-10-22 14:22:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I think you need to reevaluate your choice for the most logical candidate.
I would, however vote Mrs Clinton the most deceptive and without a doubt the most socialist.
But, if you prefer to listen to a liar and believe all her lies, you have every right to do that.
2007-10-22 14:07:05
·
answer #11
·
answered by jd4640 4
·
3⤊
3⤋