2007-10-22 05:40:06 · 19 answers · asked by sally sue 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Opp's Cheney
2007-10-22 05:57:19 · update #1
Doesn't matter what those 2-cowardly chicken-hawks think.
They do not have the authority under the US Constitution to do that unilateraly - they are required by our laws to go before congress.
A non-issue from the offices of a non-president and his non-VP!
2007-10-22 05:47:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
So if there is going to be a world war three as we conventionally think of it, where do you think it would start?
Everyone thought it would be the Soviet Union at one time. Nope, they folded up like a lawn chair.
Korea? No they just dumped their nuke program.
Japan? No, they outlawed a military in their constitution.
Germany? No they just reunited with East Germany and signed an economic pact with France.
Lybia? No, they gave up WMD.
Israel? No, they pulled out of Lebanon.
Syria? No, they pulled out of Lebanon too and just got their nukes fried by the Israelis.
Egypt? No, they made a deal with Israel.
China? No, they are hosting the Olympics and are getting cozy with everyone.
Iraq? No, no more Saddam.
Yugoslavia? No, they don't even exist anymore.
That pretty much leaves Iran.
If you would like to stick your head in the sand and say nothing about it, you go right ahead.
Your butt sticking up in the air will be a place for us to park our bicycles while we go and figure out how to avert it.
2007-10-22 12:55:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
WW3: not here that I know of.
President Bush and Vice President Cheney addressing the issue and threat to world peace;it's their job.
Someone going to stop these "madmen",your opinion,not mine.Who's to say which of us is right?
2007-10-22 12:47:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Chenay? Is that a new perfume by Chanel?
Stop them from freeing oppressed people or stopping a madman like Mahmood (spelling is off and I don't care) or Kim Jong IL (spelling rule again applies)?
Calm down, we aren't provoking ANY of these battles and wars... we are defending and pursuing. Sheesh!
2007-10-22 12:47:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
We are already in the beginnings of it, so now if you want to kill the messengers for acknowledging the reality of it, and then refer to them as mad men, be my guest.
Although they'll be out of office in a little over a year, it doesn't change the reality of what is happening in the world. Wake up and deal with it, but by all means, if someone points out the truth to you, you are foolish to call them madmen
2007-10-22 12:46:07 · answer #5 · answered by Wayne G 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Did you sleep all day long on 9-11-01? That's when Bin Laden started WW III and the radical Islamics followed suit.
2007-10-22 13:11:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I saw that on TV; I didn't like his verbage and choice of words, but I wouldn't call them madmen.
2007-10-22 13:09:21 · answer #7 · answered by School Is Great 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The fact is,according to the Bible,there IS going to be a WW3. Bush is,in fact,trying to stop this from happening. When the time comes,there will be no stopping the inevitable,no matter who is in the presidential office,and no matter who else tries to stop it.
2007-10-22 12:50:27 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Why would telling the truth make you so mad? We ARE in world war three: it's the war between the religion of Islam and Western Civilization for the control of planet Earth. I think that qualifies as a World War!
2007-10-22 12:43:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 4⤋
Chenay? Who's he?
2007-10-22 12:44:07 · answer #10 · answered by amazin'g 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋