English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Are we heading to the point that we can't even prevent guns in our own businesses and property?
Was the wild-west even that pro-gun?

2007-10-22 03:12:51 · 37 answers · asked by oohhbother 7 in Politics & Government Politics

NRA is pushing "parking lot" exclusions to banned sites: schools, workplaces,airports, wherever scared gun-toting employees go.

2007-10-22 04:08:59 · update #1

37 answers

It's one thing to believe in owning guns. It's an entirely difference matter to believe that everyone everywhere should be walking around with a holster pretending to be John Wayne. Imagine if both parties were armed with guns in every road rage incident and every argument and fist fight. It wouldn't be safe to go outdoors.


These people are nuts.

How scary would it be to have people carrying guns into the workplace? Is someone going to shoot me for making too many copies on the copier and making them wait too long?

2007-10-22 03:17:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8 8

i visit fake you question is valid and a few some moranic remark from an antigun fool. The NRA would not help this. this might make sense after a definite age, yet no person thinks that a 2nd grader is going to comprehend the assumption of existence threatening circumstances. there's a huge distinction between arming knowledgeable guards and young ones. whilst you're against knowledgeable guards at colleges, do you sense an analogous approximately knowledgeable guards at a economic business enterprise or courthouse or the White domicile? the foremost factor all human beings desires to comprehend is that criminals will usually bypass after the guy/place with the least resistance. Gun unfastened zones are a type of places. babies and elderly are yet another. i do no longer in basic terms like the assumption of having armed guards at colleges from now on than every person else, yet i will provide help to already know that it would considerably cut back the variety of incidents like Newtown from happening.

2016-12-15 06:14:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Here's the reality few seem to want to face: the police are not required or expected to protect an individual. They are only required to protect "society" as a whole. Realizing that, it is left to an individual to protect themselves. But without the proper tools to do that, an individual is powerless to protect themselves.
Having lived in a rural area such as some parts of Pennsylvania, where that need is less obvious, but the ability to is much higher; and then moving to an urban environment like Washington, DC where the need is far more obvious, but the ability is simply non-existent; I know all too well the reality that the police are powerless and unwilling to protect the population. But the citizens are powerless to protect themselves. This creates a vacuum where crime is rampant and citizens are left out in the cold, unable to enjoy the "rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
And some would say, well, they should move somewhere else. Why? Why should we surrender our homes, our towns, our cities, and our communities to the plague of crime?! If the government at each level is unwilling and unable to protect its citizens, then it citizens should be afforded every opportunity and every right to provide that protection for themselves.

2007-10-22 06:24:03 · answer #3 · answered by bmattj121 4 · 2 0

The drive promotes personal responsibility, which is always a good thing. TV promotes an image of alcohol crazed cowboys shooting pistols at everything that moves. That was little like the reality of the old west. There are about 100 million gun owners in the US, most of them are responsible adults. Why should they be denied the right to self defense?

2007-10-22 03:39:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

yeah, I do, I just saw a funny bumper sticker: "I am out of estrogen and I have a gun"
Seriously ? NO!!! (I am very familiar with guns, used them in the military, teach gun safety, skeet and trap, and have a concealed carry permit, I pack a Kimber 45 CDP to odd jobs I find now and then as I am unemplyed). Yeah, lets give teenagers raging with hormones and who do not know yet what is good judgement guns. It is like giving a monkey a hand grenade, only a matter of time and I can gurantee it will pull the pin. But, if we do I DEMAND techers should have a desk mounted 50 caliber rifle with sniper sights just to even the odds and keep little rascals in place... Teachers shall also be equipped with ak47, nothing more reliable... Lesseee, the workplace. I suggest an uniform code of arms. The guys should pack 45s (my preference would be a Wilson in a small-of-the back holster, and ladies will have 9 mm Berettas Commanders with 14 round magazine carried in thigh holsters. Tha managers will have a Belgian FN assault rifle with a greande launcher just in case things get out of hand. Afterall, armed society is a polite society, no ?
The police will be supplied with kevlar-clad Hummers and rear mounted 7.65 tank commander gun with armor piercing rounds, grenade launchers fore and aft, and a GE gattling gun with inciendary rounds for those hard to handle situations. ALL will be issued bulletproof vests. Now, that is the society I would really like see...
EDIT: to all those who are responding YES, how many of you have used a gun in anger (such as in war) and actually shot a human being ? I think I know the answer...

2007-10-22 03:37:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

If we work with people who would cause someone to think they need a gun in school or business the point would be moot. The problem is we have become too permissive with kids and not hard enough on criminals. We have also cut funding for cops and prisons.

2007-10-22 03:32:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

yes the west was that pro gun and for people having protection the same in these days you do need protection yet you will see those that use it as a sport or like in our town this past week a drive by that shot into a living room door killed a sleeping child.

2007-10-22 03:17:55 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 2 2

I support the NRA and the right to own guns, this is the first I've heard about guns in school, do you have a link?

A man with a gun is a citizen,
A man without a gun is a subject.

I'd rather have a gun I don't need than need a gun I don't have.

2007-10-22 03:23:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7 3

Can you give a source for that, because I've never heard of the NRA supporting guns in schools, and I'm a member. They support safety classes in schools, is that what you're talking about?

2007-10-22 03:17:36 · answer #9 · answered by vyperjeedai 4 · 10 2

To a degree, yes I do. What kind of schools? Adult schools, yes. Work places, yes. You're old enough to decide for yourself, as an adult.
Gays, and their supporters are allowed into our schools, and work places, allowed to exercise their rights as they please, and so should the NRA, and the Military recruiters.
Freedom is meant for all Americans, not just the ones you personally like.

2007-10-22 03:40:36 · answer #10 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 3 1

Yes, Yes, and Yes. Here's your choices.

1. Stay the same and constantly worry that some mad gunman will bust through the door and kill everyone without challenge.

2. Pay huge taxes to have the government send armed enforcers to watch over everything.

3. Have the government require all businesses and schools to have government regulated private armed security. Eliminating the need for those companies to really compete with each other or against other industries at all.

4. Allow responsible registered persons to carry weapons with no cost to the government.

2007-10-22 03:26:43 · answer #11 · answered by iooioiioo 2 · 6 4

fedest.com, questions and answers